Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKZOJZoological Journal of the Linnean Society0024-4082The
nean Society of London, 2004? 2004
140?
447467
Original Article
Lin-
P. LOZOUETEUROPEAN TERTIARY NERITILIIDAE
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 447–467. With 9 figures
The European Tertiary Neritiliidae (Mollusca,
Gastropoda, Neritopsina): indicators of tropical
submarine cave environments and freshwater faunas
PIERRE LOZOUET*
Received October 2002; accepted for publication October 2003
The oldest freshwater neritiliid, Neritilia bisinuata, is described from the Middle Eocene of the Loire Basin. Another
European species, N. neritinoides, ranging from the Lower Oligocene to Lower Miocene (Upper Burdigalian) is recognized; its habitat appears to have been freshwater, but very close to the sea. Two new marine neritiliid species from
the Aquitaine Basin are described: Bourdieria favia sp. nov. from the Upper Oligocene and Pisulinella
aucoini sp. nov. from the Lower Miocene. A third undescribed species from the Lower Miocene is referred to the
same family and related to Pisulinella. The Oligocene species has a strong spiral sculpture, a character completely
absent in previously known neritiliid species. The genus Agapilia, founded on juvenile N. neritinoides and adult Vitta
picta, appears to be a junior synonym of the genus Vitta. The associated occurrence of shells of the families Neritiliidae, Neritopsidae and Pickworthiidae (well-known inhabitants of Indo-West Pacific submarine caves) at Peyrère
suggest the first occurrence of a characteristic assemblage of dark submarine caves during the Oligocene. Both factorial analysis and relative abundance show that at Peyrère these families are associated with other cryptic fossils
(various gastropods, bivalves, Brachiopoda, corals, Annelida). However, there are indications of other submarine cave
assemblages in various Cenozoic deposits from the Palaeocene to the middle Miocene. © 2004 The Linnean Society
of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 447–467.
ADDITIONAL KEYWORDS: biogeography – Oligocene – palaeoecology – protoconch morphology – systematics.
INTRODUCTION
The family Neritiliidae was proposed by Schepman
(1908) after analysis of the morphology of the radula
had suggested that the tropical freshwater genus Neritilia should be separated from the Neritidae and Neritopsidae. Recently, Kano & Kase (2000a, b) provided
further proof that there are ample reasons for separating Neritilia and its allies from typical Neritidae
and that the erection of Neritiliidae is justified.
Beyond the anatomical differences, there are marked
differences in shell morphology between the two families, especially in the protoconch (Kano & Kase, 2001).
Based on shell microsculpture, protoconch morphology
and study of the radula of living genera, Kano & Kase
(2000a) placed two other genera in the Neritiliidae,
*E-mail: lozouet@mnhn.fr
the marine genus Pisulina and the closely similar fossil genus Pisulinella. Earlier workers (e.g. Knight
et al., 1960) had included Pisulina in the Neritidae
(Smaragdiinae Baker, 1923). For a long time, Pisulina
was known only from empty shells found at various
Indo-West Pacific localities (Herbert & Kilburn, 1991;
Hinoide & Habe, 1991). The relatively recent exploration of tropical submarine caves (Hayami & Kase,
1993b; Kano & Kase, 2000b) has shown that extant
Pisulina are among the most characteristic members
of their particular biocenotic association.
It appears that the Neritiliidae (including Neritilia
and Pisulina) tend to be strongly segregated ecologically. Neritilia species live in tropical freshwater,
although as a rule not very far from the sea, and they
extend into brackish waters. An additional species has
been described recently from anchialine habitats
(Kano, Sasaki & Ishikawa, 2001) in saline water connected by the underground aquifer to sea-water.
© 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 447–467
447
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/140/4/447/2624202 by guest on 16 November 2021
Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 55, rue de Buffon 75005 Paris, France
448
P. LOZOUET
According to Sasaki & Ishikawa (2002), it also occurs
in freshwater phreatic communities. Neritilia is now
the second group of gastropods, together with the
hydrobiids, to colonize such environments.
The fossil record of the Neritiliidae is very poor. In
1997, I recorded the presence of a new species of
Pisulina in the Upper Oligocene of south-western
France within an particular assemblage including
many cryptic elements. I also noted that Globularia
(Deshayesia) mollicula Beets, 1942, from the Neogene
of Borneo, is a Pisulina. With P. subpacifica Ladd,
1966 (a species very close to the extant P. adamsiana)
and P. miocenica Kano & Kase, 2000, both from Pacific
islands (Bikini), only four fossil species of Neritiliidae
have hitherto been recognized. No species have been
described from Europe.
In an attempt to re-evaluate the biodiversity of the
Oligocene and Miocene molluscan fauna of the French
Atlantic coasts, many new data have been collected
(Lozouet, 1997). In particular, the presence of Neritilia
was recognized in Europe for the first time. I have now
identified two freshwater species of Neritilia and two
(possibly three) marine neritiliids. Of these species
three are new. They shed new light on the history of
this family and its modern biogeographical distribution, and they are precious bench-marks in research
into the origin of the submarine cave biocenoses.
submarine cave environments (Balduzzi et al., 1989).
In contrast to principal component analysis, CA allows
simultaneous analysis of variables (columns: outcrops) and observations (rows: species) without affecting the structure of the data (Rousseau, 1990).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Description: The shell is small, solid, with a relatively flat spire. The protoconch is multispiral tilted
relative to the teleoconch coiling axis and ornamented with numerous minute pits. The teleoconch
ornament consists principally on growth lines. The
inner lip septum is flat and the adaxial margin is
straight without teeth; the outer lip is prosocline
without teeth.
CLASS GASTROPODA CUVIER, 1797 SUBCLASS
ORTHOGASTROPODA PONDER & LINDBERG, 1995
ORDER NERITOPSINA COX & KNIGHT, 1960
SUPERFAMILY NERITOIDEA RAFINESQUE, 1815
FAMILY NERITILIIDAE SCHEPMAN, 1908
The relationships of the Neritopsina continue to be
problematic (Colgan, Ponder & Eggler, 2000),
although the Neritiliidae are clearly distinct from the
Neritidae. As indicated above, the most important
shell character defining the taxonomic position of the
Neritiliidae is protoconch morphology. In Neritilia and
Pisulina, the protoconch axis is tilted relative to that
of the teleoconch (Herbert & Kilburn, 1991) and bears
several spiral ridges.
GENUS NERITILIA MARTENS, 1879
Type species (by original designation) Neritina rubida
Pease, 1867; Recent.
NERITILIA
BISINUATA SP. NOV.
(FIG. 2)
Etymology: From sinuatus (Latin), sinuous, referring
to the shape of the outer lip.
Type specimens: Holotype, coll. Le Renard (MNHNLR67776A), 2 paratypes, coll. Le Renard (MNHNLR67776B).
Type locality and horizon: France, Loire-Atlantique,
Saffré ‘Le Bois-Gouët’, Middle Eocene (Lutetian).
Other material examined: Middle Eocene, France,
Loire-Atlantique, Saffré ‘Le Bois-Gouët’, Middle
Eocene (Lutetian), coll. Le Renard, 2 ex. (MNHNLR6834).
Measurements (holotype):
width = 1.45 mm.
Height = 1.2 mm;
max.
© 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 447–467
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/140/4/447/2624202 by guest on 16 November 2021
Most of the fossils examined were collected in the
Adour Basin (sub-basin of the Aquitaine Basin, southwestern France) (Fig. 1). The Oligocene and Miocene
localities are situated in the area of Dax and Mont-deMarsan. Additional material was collected by Jacques
Le Renard (MNHN) from an Eocene outcrop of the
Loire Basin and by Didier Aucoin (Paris) from a Lower
Miocene outcrop of the Aquitaine Basin. The material
is part of a large collection (260 000 specimens) gathered over 15 years; it has already been the subject of
an analysis of the mid-Cenozoic gastropod fauna of the
European Atlantic (Lozouet, 1997). The extent of the
sampling effort may be gauged from the 112 persondays allocated to fieldwork in the Aquitanian outcrop
of Meilhan (Lozouet et al., 2001b). Fossiliferous samples were sieved in freshwater. Items larger than
3 mm were sorted in the field and split into bivalves
and gastropods; fragile fossils were isolated. Finer
fractions were sorted in the laboratory with the aid of
a dissecting microscope.
A correspondence analysis (CA; Legendre & Legendre, 1998) was conducted of all gastropods collected
in the upper Oligocene of the Adour Basin. It is a classic tool in the study of Recent and fossil continental
molluscan associations (Rousseau, 1987; Limondin &
Rousseau, 1991) and of marine assemblages such as
SYSTEMATIC PALAEONTOLOGY
EUROPEAN TERTIARY NERITILIIDAE
45°
44°
43°
Figure 1. Location of the fossil localities (★).
© 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 447–467
0°
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/140/4/447/2624202 by guest on 16 November 2021
1°
449
450
P. LOZOUET
Description: The shell is minute, solid, very elongate
neritiform with a relatively high spire for the group.
The protoconch is multispiral, eroded but clearly tilted
relative to the teleoconch. Teleoconch whorls up to 1.4
in number, increasing rapidly in size, inflated with a
round periphery. The sutural line is gently impressed.
The surface of the shell is relatively altered but one
can distinguish spiral ridges and sinuous growth
lines, which are particularly strong close to the aperture. The semicircular aperture is relatively small and
inclined at about 42∞ relative to the teleoconch coiling
axis. The outer lip is prosocline and sinuous with two
notches, widely bevelled and slightly dilated outward.
The inner lip is covered with a smooth, extensive callus; the adaxial margin is straight, without teeth.
Remarks: This very small species is unique within
Neritilia because of the presence of well-developed spiral ridges and strong sinuous growth lines. It is also
the smallest Neritilia species known.
NERITILIA
(COSSMANN & PEYROT,
1917) (FIG. 3)
NERITINOIDES
1917 Teinostoma neritinoides Cossmann & Peyrot:
n∞126, pl. 7, figs 11-13.
© 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 447–467
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/140/4/447/2624202 by guest on 16 November 2021
Figure 2. Neritilia bisinuata sp. nov. from Bois-Gouët (Middle Eocene). A, apertural view of the holotype (MNHNLR67776A); B, apical view of a paratype (MNHN-LR67776B), C, apical view of the protoconch; arrow indicates the embryonic shell.
EUROPEAN TERTIARY NERITILIIDAE
Material examined: Lower
Oligocene
(Rupelian
stage), France, Landes, Orist (Carrère), 4 ex. (MNHNPL15357). Upper Oligocene (Chattian stage), Landes,
France: Bélus (Marcon), 1 ex. [MNHN-PL14502],
Bélus (Tauziède), 2 ex. [MNHN-PL14503]. Lower
Miocene (Burdigalian stage), France: Gironde, Pessac
(Cap de Bos), 35 ex. [MNHN-PL4185]; Landes, Mimbaste, 1 ex. [MNHN-PL14078]; Landes, Lucbardez
(Mondiet) 250 ex. [MNHN-PL15281].
Measurements (specimen from Lucbardez, Fig. 3E):
Height 3.2 mm; max. width 3.45 mm.
Remarks: In the original description, Cossmann &
Peyrot (1917) referred N. neritinoides to the genus Teinostoma (Vitrinellidae). The punctuated protoconch
with its embryonic shell covered by a thin callus
(Fig. 3F, G) supports a new assignment to Neritilia.
Like the Recent Neritilia species, the septum is flat
and covered by a very slightly pustulated callus. The
outer lip has a gently sinuous outline, less strongly so
than in N. bisinuata, but stronger than in the extant
Neritilia.
It seems very likely that Harzhauser & Kowalke
(2001), in their description of the new genus Agapilia,
have mistakenly confused a true neritiliid close to
N. neritinoides for a neritid. The type species is Neritina picta Férussac, 1825, a well-known Lower
Miocene species of the Aquitaine basin that occurs in
many European Neogene deposits. For these authors,
N. picta combines neritid (teleoconch with numerous
columellar teeth and persistent coloration on the shell)
and neritiliid (protoconch with minute pits covering
the surface) characters. Classically (see Lozouet,
Lesport & Renard, 2001a), N. picta was assigned to the
genus Vitta Mörch, 1852 (Neritidae). Our juvenile
specimens have been selected from the type basin.
Their protoconchs appear to be smooth like those of all
the Neritidae (Fig. 3K). The shells of juveniles have a
well-known and consistent coloration pattern whereas
the juvenile specimen illustrated by Harzhauzer &
Kowalke (2001) has no such pattern. I suspect that the
authors have mixed up adult specimens of Vitta picta
with a juvenile specimen of a true smaller species of
Neritilia. The fact that the so-called young specimen of
Agapilia picta has a smooth teleoconch without teeth
on the inner lip is another clear indication of confusion
of specimens belonging to two different taxa. At the
same size (half adult whorl), V. picta has a colour pattern and well developed tooth on the inner lip (Fig. 3L).
Accordingly, I conclude that Agapilia with its type species N. picta is a junior synonym of Vitta. Agapilia
Harzhauzer & Kowalke, 2001 refers pro-parte to
N. picta (adult specimens) or to a neritiliid, probably
N. neritinoides (juvenile specimen).
BOURDIERIA
GEN. NOV.
Type species: Bourdieria faviai sp. nov.
Etymology: Dedicated to the late Franck Bourdier,
one of the most original French Quaternary geologists
of the last century.
Description: The shell is small, typically about 3.24.4 mm maximum adult width, very solid, with a flat
spire. The protoconch is multispiral, tilted relative to
the teleoconch coiling axis and ornamented with spiral
ridges. The teleoconch is ornamented with strong spiral cords. The inner lip bears five to six teeth and the
outer lip bears four strong teeth. The semicircular
aperture is highly prosocline.
Remarks: Superficially, B. faviai is more similar to
members of Neritidae than to any genus of Neritiliidae. In fact, Bourdieria is unique among the Neritiliidae because of the presence of strong spiral cords on
the teleoconch. Compared to other Neritiliidae, the
spire is also especially flat. The protoconch is tilted relative to the teleoconch (Fig. 4I) with spiral ridges
(Fig. 4G) clearly indicating its position in Neritiliidae.
BOURDIERIA FAVIAI
(FIG. 4)
SP. NOV.
1917 Nerita (Pila) basteroti Recluz, 1850 – Cossmann
& Peyrot, n∞144, pl. 10, figs 38, 39 [not Recluz,
1850].
1974 Nerita subcaronis d’Orbigny, 1852 – Magne &
Vergneau-Saubade: 5 (pars) [not d’Orbigny, 1852].
Etymology: Dedicated to Raymond Favia for his assistance in field collection.
Type specimens: Holotype (MNHN-PL1634A),
paratypes (MNHN-PL1634B-E).
4
Type locality and horizon: France, Landes, Peyrehorade (Peyrère), Upper Oligocene, marls with
Eulepidina.
© 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 447–467
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/140/4/447/2624202 by guest on 16 November 2021
Description (Lower Miocene specimen from Lucbardez): The shell is small, solid, elongate neritiform,
with a moderate spire. The multispiral protoconch is
covered by a thin callus, spiral and axial ridges and
minute pits entirely covering the surface. The glossy
teleoconch is sculptured with very fine axial growth
lines only. The large semicircular aperture is inclined
at about 28 ∞ relative to the coiling axis, with a flat
thick septum (callus). The adaxial margin of the inner
lip is straight; the outer lip is prosocline without teeth.
The shell lacks a colour pattern. The operculum is
elongate with rounded ends; the outer side shows faint
growth lines and an eccentric nucleus, the inner side is
smooth with a short apophysis appendage (peg) near
the abapical end. Parallel to the abapical margin there
is a long muscle scar.
451
452
P. LOZOUET
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/140/4/447/2624202 by guest on 16 November 2021
Figure 3. A-J, Neritilia neritinoides (Cossmann & Peyrot, 1917). K & L, Vitta picta (Férussac, 1825). A-D, operculum. E,
apertural view (MNHN-PL15281). F, apical view of the protoconch. G, enlarged portion of the protoconch showing minute
pits (MNHN-PL4185). H, apertural view. I, right lateral view. J, dorsal view (MNHN-PL14078). K, apical view of the protoconch. L, juvenile specimen of 0.8 whorl with operculum showing a tooth (arrowed) on the inner lip (MNHN-PL15385).
Sources of specimens: A-E, Lucbardez; F & G, Pessac; H-L, Mimbaste (all Lower Miocene).
© 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 447–467
EUROPEAN TERTIARY NERITILIIDAE
453
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/140/4/447/2624202 by guest on 16 November 2021
Figure 4. Bourdieria faviai sp. nov. from Peyrère (Upper Oligocene). A, broken specimen (apical whorls removed) showing (arrowed) the ridge inside the aperture (MNHN-PL1634E). B & C, juvenile specimen of 0.8 adult whorl (MNHNPL1634C). B, apical view of the protoconch showing the position of three weak ridges (arrowed). D-F, views of the holotype
(MNHN-PL1634A); D, apertural view, E, right lateral view, F, dorsal view. G, view of the apical part showing the ridges of
the protoconch (arrow). H, broken specimen showing internal view of the columellar area. I & J, apical view of the protoconch; arrow indicates the embryonic shell. I, detail of the embryonic shell.
© 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 447–467
454
P. LOZOUET
Other material examined: Upper Oligocene, France,
Landes, Peyrehorade (Peyrère), 50 ex. (MNHNPL1634F).
Measurements (holotype): Height 3.0 mm; max. width
4.0 mm.
Remarks: Bourdieria faviai has been variously interpreted. Cossmann & Peyrot (1917) incorrectly identified it as a young specimen of one of the most
common neritids (Nerita basteroti) of the Lower
Miocene. Magne & Vergneau-Saubade (1974) identified young specimens of N. basteroti sensu Cossmann & Peyrot with N. subcaronis d’Orbigny, 1852,
a problematic Lower Miocene species initially
described by Grateloup (1847) under the name
N. caronis. Despite several visits to the collections of
the University of Bordeaux-Talence, where the
Grateloup collection is housed, I have been unable to
locate the figured and only known specimen of
N. subcaronis. According to the figures of Grateloup
(1847: pl. 5, fig. 45) and Magne & Vergneau-Saubade (1974), the septal lip of Nerita subcaronis bears
many small denticles which B. faviai lacks. B. faviai
is therefore easily differentiated from the Neritidae
by its small size, the heavy, smooth, convex callus,
the large regular teeth on the outer lip and the
tilted protoconch typical of the Neritiliidae. B. faviai
occurs only in the Saubrigues palaeocanyon and is
only common in one site.
Type species (by original designation): Pisulinella
pacifica Kano & Kase, 2000; Miocene of Eniwetok
Atoll.
Description: The shell is small, about 4 mm maximum
adult width, globulous, very solid. The protoconch is
multispiral, tilted relative to the teleoconch coiling
axis and ornamented with spiral ridges. The shell surface is smooth and ornamented with fine growth lines.
The inner lip septum is slightly convex and the adaxial margin bears three or four inconspicuous teeth. A
shallow groove on the inner lip callus extends along
the inner line. The outer lip is prosocline and bears
many weak tubercles.
PISULINELLA? AUCOINI SP.
(FIG. 5)
NOV.
Etymology: Dedicated to Didier Aucoin, a very active
fossil collector in the Paris and Aquitaine Basins.
Type specimens: Holotype (MNHN-PL15355A), 1 paratype (MNHN-PL15356B).
Type locality and horizon: France, Landes, Meilhan
(Vives), Lower Miocene (Aquitanian stage).
Other material examined: Lower Miocene, Landes,
Meilhan (Vives), 1 ex. (coll. Aucoin, private collection)
Measurements (holotype): Height 2.6 mm; max. width
2.9 mm.
Description: The shell is small, very solid, obliquely
ovate in shape, with a low spire. The teleoconch, which
consists of little more than two rounded whorls,
increases rapidly, with an impressed suture. The globular protoconch is poorly preserved in the available
material and while partially covered by the first teleoconch whorl, the limit between protoconch and teleoconch is clear; the suture between the embryonic and
larval shells is not distinguishable in our specimens.
The glossy teleoconch is sculptured with fine axial
growth lines only, which are better developed close to
the aperture. The semicircular aperture is highly
prosocline (38–40∞ relative to the shell axis), with a
thick septum (callus) and a blunt outer line. The septum is slightly convex, smooth, the columellar area
bearing two main teeth; a third results from the subdivision of the abapical tooth. The outer lip is blunt,
thickened by a well-developed inductura, and bears
five strong teeth. Inside the aperture there is a relatively long ridge near the base, probably representing
the innermost limit of the opercular retraction.
Remarks: P. aucoini differs from B. faviai by a more
elongate shell form and the absence of spiral cords.
The presence of spiral cords being unique among the
© 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 447–467
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/140/4/447/2624202 by guest on 16 November 2021
Description: The shell is small, very solid, obliquely
ovate in shape, with a very flat spire. The teleoconch consists of more than 2.5 rounded whorls,
increasing very rapidly, with a depressed suture line
that is difficult to observe due to the development of
spiral cords. The globular protoconch (poor state of
preservation in available material) is partially covered by the first teleoconch whorl; the boundary
between protoconch and teleoconch is very clearly
differentiated. Three or four spiral ridges are
present close to the apertural line; the suture separating embryonic and larval shells is not clearly visible on the available specimens. The teleoconch is
sculptured with 14–15 spiral cords and axial growth
lines. The semicircular aperture is highly prosocline
(about 49∞ relative to the shell axis) with a thick
septum (inner lip callus) and a very blunt outer
line; the arcuate septum is slightly convex and
smooth. The columellar area bears 5–6 blunt teeth
deeply situated inside the aperture, the adapical
three being smaller. The blunt outer lip is thickened by a well-developed inductura, bearing four
regularly spaced strong teeth. Inside the aperture
there is a relatively long ridge near the base probably representing the innermost limit of the opercular retraction.
GENUS PISULINELLA KANO & KASE, 2000
EUROPEAN TERTIARY NERITILIIDAE
455
Neritiliidae, their absence in P. aucoini excludes a
placement in Bourdieria. P. aucoini is very similar in
shape to Pisulinella miocenica Kano & Kase, 2000a,
but is easily distinguished by the large teeth on the
outer lip; it is possible that the absence of a shallow
groove on the inner lips callus of P. aucoini could be
an apomorphic character of Pisulinella (Kano &
Kase, 2000a) resulting from the poor preservation of
the available specimens. In any event, the generic
assignment of P. miocenica cannot be clearly
indicated.
The three specimens of P. aucoini were collected
together with abundant reef coral debris (Pocillopora)
and many other rare molluscs such as the muricid
Galeropsis lavenayanus Hupé, 1860 (see Lozouet &
Renard, 1998). Judging from the morphology of coral
fragments and the limited thickness of this layer, it is
not possible to be sure that a true coral reef was their
habitat. Nevertheless, the layer yielded coral patches
of Porites exceeding 3 m in length and 1.5 m in height
(Lozouet et al., 2001b). It may be suggested with some
confidence that P. aucoini was a cryptic species living
in crevices of a coral patch-reef.
PISULINELLA?
SP. (FIG.
6)
Material studied: Lower Miocene (Burdigalian),
France, Landes, Mimbaste; 1 ex. (MNHN-PL15356).
Only one juvenile specimen of this form has been collected from the Lower Miocene (Burdigalian) of Mimbaste (Landes). This outcrop has yielded some
elements of hard bottom and cryptic fauna (Neritopsidae, Pickworthiidae) associated with a rich marine
littoral sand fauna. The protoconch of Pisulinella? sp.
bears several ribs similar to those observed in the genera Pisulinella and Bourdieria. The teleoconch is
sculptured with fine spiral ribs that exclude assignment to B. faviai. P. aucoini differs by the absence of
© 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 447–467
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/140/4/447/2624202 by guest on 16 November 2021
Figure 5. Pisulinella? aucoini sp. nov. from Meilhan (Lower Miocene). A, broken specimen (apical whorls removed)
showing (arrowed) the ridge inside the aperture (MNHN-PL15356B). B & C, holotype (MNHN-PL15355A). B, in apertural
view; C in right lateral view.
456
P. LOZOUET
spiral ribs on the teleoconch. I consider that this specimen represents a third undescribed marine neritiliid
species, although a full description and clear indication of generic position is postponed until further
material becomes available. Placement within the
genus Pisulinella is based on the fact that the sculpture comprises only very fine spiral ribs - specimens of
B. faviai which are the same size already bear strong
spiral cords.
PALAEOENVIRONMENT OF EUROPEAN
FOSSIL NERITILIIDS
DID NERITILIA
NERITINOIDES INHABIT FRESH OR
BRACKISH WATER?
In the Lower Oligocene (Orist), four juvenile specimens of Neritilia have been collected on a beach sand
deposit and are very abraded. In the Upper Oligocene,
N. neritinoides has been found in a very fine sand
layer (5–10 mm thick) included in a marly sequence.
The predominantly marine molluscs are mixed with
species which inhabit fresh and brackish water, suggesting that they originate from a variety of environments (Lozouet, 2003). The temporarily accessible
outcrops of Pessac (Lower Miocene) have also yielded a
rich mixed fauna (Lozouet & Gourgues, 1995) in a
sequence 4 m thick of very fossiliferous calcareous
sand, including cross-bedded and shell lenses, indicating the influence of tidal currents. The studied sample
of Cap de Bos contains 1345 gastropod specimens rep-
resenting 125 species. Of these 114 (1123 specimens)
are marine, six (129 specimens) are freshwater and
five (93 specimens) are possibly brackish-water species. Brackish and freshwater specimens account for
16.5% of the total fauna. This layer also contains many
pieces of lignitized wood and a few fossils of mammals
and crocodilians have been reported (Duranthon &
Cahuzac, 1997), which confirms the influence of a
river.
In the Lower Miocene (Lucbardez ‘Mondiet’),
N. neritinoides occurs at the top of a 5-m thick section
with alternating sandy marls, limestone banks and
sandy limestones. It is one of the commonest species,
and the specimens are perfectly preserved. Analysis of
the variation of the faunistic components of this outcrop should help provide a more precise description of
the environment of N. neritinoides. The sequence from
base to top is as follows:
(1) 0-35 cm, calcareous sandy marl with numerous
potamid gastropods (Granulolabium plicatum
(Bruguière, 1792)).
(2) 35-135 cm, sandy marls including two limestone
banks (10 and 20 cm thick); molluscs are dominated by one carditid (Bivalvia) species accumulated in the shelly limestones.
(3) 135-285 cm, yellow calcareous sand containing
only very fine mollusc debris.
(4) 285-305 cm, heterogeneous limestone with sandy
patches.
(5) 305-315/320 cm, yellow sand with Melanopsis.
© 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 447–467
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/140/4/447/2624202 by guest on 16 November 2021
Figure 6. Pisulinella sp. from Mimbaste (Lower Miocene). A, apical view of the protoconch; arrow indicates the embryonic
shell (MNHN-PL15356). B, enlarged portion of the protoconch showing the spiral ridges.
EUROPEAN TERTIARY NERITILIIDAE
(6) 320-370 cm, brown-red humic sand, with very fine
lignitic beds including Melanopsis.
(7) 370-395 cm, weathered clay with preserved fauna
(Melanopsis, Congeria) only at the bottom.
(8) 395-495 cm, Quaternary sand, ‘Sable des Landes’.
Melanopsis dufourii Férussac, 1822 is very close to
the extant M. praemorsa (Linné, 1758), a circum-Mediterranean species living in running water (brooks,
irrigation canals, rapids and springs) rather than
stagnant water, and tolerating desiccation and moderate salinity (Brown, 1994). Dreissenidae also live in
freshwater and tolerate moderate salinity (Archambault-Guezou, 1976). The Planorbidae, such as Gyraulus, are a typically freshwater element but the extant
species G. laevis (Alder, 1838) (very similar to
G. balizacencis) may occur in inland waters close to
the sea, tolerating slightly brackish conditions (Kerney, 1999). Gyraulus species generally live in quiet
water, among weeds. The two most common hydrobiid
species do not belong to the brackish-water fossil
group of Hydrobia andreaei Boettger, 1892 (Lozouet
et al., 2001a) but resemble hydrobiids that inhabit
waters of low to moderate salinity. Another species is
suggestive of the extant Mercuria confusa (Frauenfeld, 1863), a hydrobiid mostly restricted to freshwater
in estuaries and pools. I also add one species of Unionidae and the gastropods Acroloxus cestasensis (Peyrot,
1932) (Acroloxidae) and Ferrissia sp. (Planorbidae);
these species belong to freshwater groups. The extant
Ferrissia wautieri (Mirolli, 1960) lives in stagnant or
slowly moving water with ample vegetation (Kerney,
1999). A displaced terrestrial found in this assemblage
species belongs to the genus Carychium (Ellobiidae).
Analysis of the fauna of this sequence shows the
evolution of the shallow water and lagoonal community towards a freshwater environment. As indicated
by the good state of preservation of the molluscs and
the habitats of their modern counterparts, layers 5–7
are freshwater deposits. This provides evidence that
N. neritinoides belongs to a freshwater community
probably able to tolerate slight salinity. Like the other
species of Neritilia, it has a planktotrophic stage (as
indicated by the protoconch); it has been postulated
that this type of larval veliger, after hatching in freshwater, needs to reach the sea and then return to an
inland environment (Kano et al., 2001). Due to the
lack of palaeotopographic information one cannot be
precise about previous environmental conditions
where N. neritinoides has been collected, but it is presumed that it was an estuary or freshwater lake close
to the sea.
IS
THE PRESENCE OF
BOURDIERIA
FAVIAI SP. NOV.
INDICATIVE OF SUBMARINE CAVES?
The new marine neritiliid Bourdieria faviai is very
common in only one outcrop (Peyrère), which is situated near the head of a submarine palaeocanyon
(Fig. 7). The Saubrigues palaeocanyon, which is several hundred metres deep, results from a major erosion phase located at the Lower–Upper Oligocene
© 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 447–467
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/140/4/447/2624202 by guest on 16 November 2021
Layers 1 and 2 were probably deposited under shallow
marine/lagoon conditions as indicated by the genus
Granulolabium (see Lozouet et al., 2001a). This Lower
Miocene biocenosis, of low diversity and dominated by
Venericardia and Granulolabium, strikingly resembles the lagoonal community described by Gitton, Lozouet & Maestrati (1986) at the top of the marine
sequence of the Lower Oligocene of the Paris Basin
(Ormoy fauna).
In layer 3, the shells are very scattered. A more
careful study of a sample rich in mollusc fragments
revealed that the dominant species are the small
Ervilia and Lentidium bivalves. A species of Lucinidae
was also recorded. The most commonly found gastropods are young specimens of Hydrobia cf. aturensis
and Granulolabium plicatum. In the finest fraction,
the species Pelecydion sp. (Pelecydionidae) is unusually abundant. Species of this tropical family are generally considered as very rare. However, during the
‘Expédition Montrouzier’ to New Caledonia (Bouchet
et al., 2002), an association of small Mollusca including Pelecydion, Iravadiidae, Cornirostridae was collected in coarse beach sediments (C. Erseus, pers.
comm.). The bivalve Lentidium is a characteristic
genus of the ‘Upper clean sand’ assemblages of the
Mediterranean Sea (Pérès, 1982) having been
reported in the same environment since the Oligocene
of the Paris Basin (Gitton et al., 1986). As this corresponds to the surf zone of the lower beach, it concurs
with the presence of Pelecydion sp.
Layer 3 may be interpreted as a spillover deposited
on the subtidal sediment of the estuarine side of a littoral spit. Intrusion of material from a dynamic
marine environment into relatively static and brackish areas is characteristic of storm deposits. An additional corroboration of this interpretation is the
ecology of the more abundant species of layers 5–7, in
decreasing order of frequency: Melanopsis dufourii
Férussac, 1822, Gyraulus balizacencis (Peyrot, 1931),
Neritilia neritinoides, Hydrobia spp. (three species).
The predominance of Congeria basteroti (Deshayes,
1836) is significant. All these species are very well preserved. The numerous N. neritinoides have a glossy
surface and details of the protoconch are clearly preserved. In contrast, the rare brackish elements of the
malacofauna (estuarine or lagoonal) have been collected only in layer 5 (Gastropoda: Granulolabium plicatum, Bivalvia: Anadara cardiiformis (Basterot,
1825), Venericardia pinnula (Basterot, 1825)), and are
highly abraded.
457
458
P. LOZOUET
St-Paul-les-Dax
`
"Abesse, Falaise"
0
3 km
r
u
do
A
N
St-Jean-de-Marsacq
Saubrigues
St-Etienne-d'Orthe
"Eglise A & B"
Belus
´
Limits of the exposure of
Upper Oligocene and Miocene deposits
Peyrere
`
Middle Miocene (Langhian)
Lower Miocene (Upper Burdigalian)
Lower Miocene (Aquitanian)
Upper Oligocene (Chattian)
Les G
aves
re´ un
is
Peyrehorade
Figure 7. Location of the Peyrère outcrop in the late Oligocene to mid Miocene fill of the Saubrigues palaeocanyon (from Kieken, 1973; Cahuzac et al., 1995).
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/140/4/447/2624202 by guest on 16 November 2021
© 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 447–467
Dax
EUROPEAN TERTIARY NERITILIIDAE
glossan Julia douvillei (Cossmann & Peyrot, 1914) or
the Amphithalamus immigrus (Lozouet, 1998) live
and feed on very shallow-biotope green algae (Caulerpa for the Sacoglossa; see Le Renard, 1983). This
demonstrates that at least part of the fauna lived in
the higher photic zone. On the other hand, some very
common gastropods (such as Alvania peyreirensis
Cossmann & Peyrot, 1919, and Benthonellania antepelagica Lozouet, 1990 developed in the darker circalittoral zone of the canyon and possibly penetrated the
top of the bathyal zone.
As establishing the ecological significance of
B. faviai requires a detailed study of the Peyrère
assemblage, I first compare the latter’s gastropod
fauna with that of the Upper Oligocene of the Adour
Basin in order to identify the significant species. In
view of the diversity and abundance of the material
(1138 species) an analysis based on data processing
with multivariate methods has proved to be particularly efficient (Fig. 8). I then compare these results
with analyses of the dominant gastropod fauna and
other associated groups.
3
shallow-water
assemblages
group 3
circalittoral/upper bathyal
mud assemblages
2
Eglise A
group 1
Lestrilles
Mineur A
1
Hondelatte
Eglise C
Verdun
Ab. Chateau
ˆ
Falaise
-1.5
Tauzia (Haut)
Troun
axis 1 (16%)
0
0
-1
Estoti
Bezoye B
Abesse B
-1
1
Tauziede
` B
1.5
2
muddy detritic
assemblages
2.5
(group 2)
Mineur B
-2
`
Peyrere
axis 3 (8.9%)
-3
= outcrops
group 4
Paleocanyon
assemblages
including submarine cave
assemblage
= taxa
Figure 8. Relationships between taxa (1138 species) and sites (20 outcrops) using the second factorial plane (F1 and 3) of
the CA. The distribution of the assemblages suggests segregation into four groups.
© 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 447–467
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/140/4/447/2624202 by guest on 16 November 2021
boundary (Kieken, 1973) that coincides (Dolin, Dolin
& Lozouet, 1985) with an important low-stand of the
eustatic sea-curve of Vail et al. (1977). The palaeocanyon became immersed during the Late Oligocene due
to the eustatic rise in sea-level. As a result it preserved
the only accessible Upper Oligocene outcrops in
France, rich in circalittoral and bathyal faunas. The
palaeocanyon is filled extensively with Late Oligocene
and Early to Middle Miocene sediments (Dolin et al.,
1985; Cahuzac, Janin & Steurbaut, 1995).
Earlier investigations carried out on the Peyrère
assemblage led to quite contradictory results. For
Dolin et al. (1985) it resembled a present-day detritic
community living in the sublittoral zone, at depths
between 50 and 100 m (Pérès, 1982). This interpretation does not differ from that of Steurbaut (1982)
derived from fish otoliths, or that of Chevalier (1963)
based on corals. On the contrary, Cahuzac & Chaix
(1996) claimed that the presence of corals indicates a
quiet, soft muddy bottom between 30 and 50 m or less.
Contradictions are also apparent within the gastropod
fauna. Some well preserved molluscs such as the saco-
459
460
P. LOZOUET
(1) contains the shallow-water calcareous facies outcropping in the vicinity of Dax;
(2) contains muddy sand assemblages localized in the
palaeocanyon;
(3) contains palaeocanyon mud assemblages (circalittoral to upper bathyal);
(4) is limited to the Peyrère fauna, another palaeocanyon locality.
Characteristic gastropod species of the Peyrère
assemblage
Species which feature prominently in F3 can be considered as the most characteristic of the Peyrère
assemblage. They are: Nassarius aturensis (Peyrot,
1925) (1.5%) Alvania argillensis Lozouet, 1988 (1.3%),
Gemmula rotata peyreirensis (Peyrot, 1931) (1.3%),
Microglyphis sp. (1.3%), Calliotropis rivulusensis Lozouet, 1999 (1.1%), Bourdieria faviai sp. nov. (1.1%),
Cantharus sp. (1.1%), Drilliolia sedentaria Lozouet,
1998 (1%), Bela pyrenaica (Peyrot, 1931) (1%),
Praescissurella peyreirensis Lozouet, 1998 (0.8%),
Emarginula teneraeformis Lozouet, 1999 (0.8%), Neritopsis moniliformis Grateloup, 1832 (0.8%), Hipponyx
benoisti (0.8%), Ataxocerithium degrangei (Cossmann
& Peyrot, 1919) (0.8%) and Triforis tertia Lozouet,
1998 (0.8%).
Among these, C. rivulusensis, Microglyphis sp.,
N. aturensis and G. rotata peyreirensis are exclusive to
the mud assemblages of the palaeocanyon; they were
not collected in the outcrop (despite the name ‘peyreirensis’ for the Gemmula).
Those restricted to the outcrop include B. faviai,
P. peyreirensis and N. moniliformis, while those which
are simply found more frequently within it include A.
argillensis, E. teneraeformis, H. benoisti, A. degrangei,
T. tertia, Cantharus sp. and B. pyrenaica.
The presence of Alvania, Cantharus and Bela does
not indicate a specific biotope. Conversely, Bourdieria
and Neritopsis are significant indicators. In the IndoWest Pacific, Neritopsis is restricted to submarine
caves (Kase & Hayami, 1992). The genus is also
recorded from the Caribbean but only as dead shells;
thus the habitat is not yet known. As mentioned
above, Bourdieria is close to Pisulina, one of the best
modern indicators of a submarine cave biocenosis. The
other species have specialized feeding habitats and fit
well into a sciaphilous sessile epifauna. The Cerithiopsidae (Ataxocerithium), Triforidae (Triforis) and Fissurellidae (Emarginula) feed on sponges. Hipponyx is
semisessile. Praescissurella sp. has been collected
from the outer reef slope in New Caledonia (Koumac,
Expédition Montrouzier; see Bouchet et al., 2002). The
Scissurellidae move freely on rocky or gravelly substrates but also live in submarine caves where they
are particularly common (Kase & Hayami, 1992; Di
Geronimo et al., 1997). Apart from these highly characteristic species, I have also identified in the Peyrère
assemblage the earliest fossil species of Larocheopsis
(Larocheopsis marshalli Lozouet, 1998; Scissurellidae,
Larocheinae). This Oligocene species is very close to
L. tesselata (Kase & Kano, 2002), which lives in a
Pacific submarine cave. Kase & Kano (2002) proposed
including L. marshalli and L. tesselata within a new
genus, Trogloconcha. Another Recent species referred
to Trogloconcha (T. ohashii Kase & Kano, 2002) is
© 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 447–467
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/140/4/447/2624202 by guest on 16 November 2021
Gastropod factor analysis
The analysis involved 20 outcrops from which
80 000 specimens were taken, resulting in the identification of 1138 species. The material came from
different sampling projects in a number of localities. The biodiversity data are not exactly comparable because the duration of excavation and sorting
was not equal for all the sites; thus frequency is
coded using a 4.3 ratio geometric progression
(coded strengths vary between 0 and 6. Thus 0 = no
specimens; 2 = 4–8; 3 = 19–80; 4 = 81–350; 5 = 350–
1500; 6 = > 1500). For Frontier & Pichod-Viale
(1991) this coding was adapted specifically for CA
because it reduces the numerical difference
between well and poorly represented species and
more easily retains the patterns of variation in
representation.
The three axes (F1-3) represent 35.3% of the total
variability (information) of the global sample (F1
16%, F2 10.4%, F3 8.9%). F1 distinguishes, on the
negative side, outcrops from the littoral zone and on
the positive side, outcrops from the palaeocanyon
zone (see Fig. 8). F2 discriminates a single outcrop,
St-Paul-lès-Dax ‘Falaise’, which contributes 86% of
the data. Species featuring strongly include Olivia
pygmaea (Cossmann & Peyrot, 1917) (1.6%), Strombus bonellii Brongniart, 1823 (2.1%), Bistolida cf.
proflavicula (Sacco, 1894) (2.1%), Trivia cf. excoccinella Sacco (1894) (1.6%), Dorsanum lineolatum
(Grateloup, 1834) (2.1%), Oliva dufresnei Basterot,
1825 (2.1%), Tudicla rusticula (Basterot, 1825) (1.1%).
It is interesting to note that these Miocene species
appear for the first time in the Falaise outcrop. In
fact, it contains a notably larger number of Miocene
species than any other upper Oligocene deposit in the
Adour Basin and has therefore been interpreted as
the uppermost Oligocene layer of the basin (Lozouet,
1997).
F3 is characterized by the high contribution of Peyrère (60.4%) and of the two other outcrops of the palaeocanyon (St-Etienne-d’Orthe ‘Eglise A’, 11.6%; ‘Eglise
C’, 16%). The second factorial plane (F1 and 3, Fig. 8)
reveals the peculiar position of the Peyrère assemblage within the Adour Basin faunas, particularly
those of the palaeocanyon. The distribution of the
diverse assemblages suggests segregation into four
groups:
EUROPEAN TERTIARY NERITILIIDAE
widely distributed throughout the Indo-West Pacific.
It lives at depths of between 4 and 51 m, in gloomy to
totally dark caves that are incompletely filled with calcareous muddy sands (Kase & Kano, 2002).
Thus, the characteristic species of Peyrère identified
by the CA are those which inhabit cryptic environments or hard substrates with sessile fauna.
Streptodictyon (s.l.) sp. and Circulus pseudogymnobasis) are common in several localities of the palaeocanyon, accounting for 49.6% of the total.
Homalopoma, a common group of hard bottom
dwellers, includes several species adapted to cryptic
environments: H. sanguineum (Linné, 1758) is frequent in Mediterranean submarine caves (Di Geronimo et al., 1997), while other Homalopoma species are
common in the Ryukyu submarine caves (T. Kase,
pers. comm.).
Species of the family Pickworthiidae, such as Mareleptopoma cf. kenneyi, are very characteristic of modern submarine cave environments (Kase, 1998) but
are not strictly restricted to them. They have been also
collected hidden under stones in the littoral zone
(Touho, New Caledonia; S. Gofas & A. Warén, pers.
comm.). Considering the size of the Pickworthiidae
(ranging between 0.5 mm and a few millimetres),
cryptic conditions are easily found in coarse detrital
Table 1. The 25 most common species of Peyrère (66% of the total specimens) ranked in decreasing order of abundance.
*Species characteristic of muddy bottom environments. †Species restricted to, or commonest in, the outcrop. Substrate conditions and food sources are deduced from those of their modern counterparts
Taxa
Substrate conditions
Food source
Number of
specimens
Alvania peyreirensis Cossmann & Peyrot, 1919*
Ringicula semidecorata Morlet, 1882*
Crisilla vera (Cossmann & Peyrot, 1919)
Homalopoma granulosa (Grateloup, 1828)
Benthonellania antepelagica Lozouet, 1990*
Alvania argillensis Lozouet, 1998†
Alvania discazalorum Lozouet, 1998*
Mareleptopoma cf. kenneyi (Ladd, 1966)†
Turritella raulini Cossmann & Peyrot, 1922*
Pusillina cf. grateloupi (Vergneau-Saubade,
1968)
Monodontella peyreirensis (Cossm. & Peyrot,
1917)†
Jujubinus quantulus Lozouet, 1999†
Diastoma ultimum Cossmann & Peyrot, 1922*
Ceritoturris fecunda Lozouet, 1999*
Streptodictyon (s.l.) sp.*
Scissurella lamellosa Benoist, 1875
Bourdieria faviai sp. nov.†
Agathodonta moulinsii (Grateloup, 1827)†
Volvarina aturensis (Peyrot, 1928)
Stosicia buccinalis (Grateloup, 1828)†
vagile
vagile
vagile
vagile
vagile
vagile
vagile
vagile
vagile
vagile
detritus
foraminifera, detritus
algae, detritus
algae detritus
detritus
algae, detritus
algae, detritus
detritus?
suspended material
algae, detritus
1100
980
790
627
560
398
356
333
280
251
Hespererato cf. rhenana Schilder, 1933†
Olivia oligocaenica Lozouet, 1999†
Cantharus sp.†
Circulus pseudogymnobasis Lozouet, 1998
Amphithalamus immigrus Lozouet, 1998
Total
on
on
on
on
on
on
on
on
on
on
muddy bottom
muddy bottom
algae
hard bottom
muddy bottom
muddy bottom?
muddy bottom
hard bottom
muddy bottom
algae
vagile on hard bottom
algae, detritus
247
vagile on algae
vagile on muddy bottom
vagile on muddy bottom
vagile on muddy bottom.
vagile on hard bottom
vagile on hard bottom
vagile on hard bottom
vagile on hard/muddy bottom
vagile on algae or
hard/muddy bottom
vagile on hard/muddy bottom
vagile on hard bottom
vagile on hard/muddy bottom
vagile on muddy bottom
vagile on algae
algae, detritus
detritus
polychaetes
carrion, polychaetes, etc.
algae, detritus
detritus
algae, detritus
carrion?, fish
234
213
195
171
162
138
134
130
algae, detritus
ascidians
algae, detritus
carrion, polychaetes, etc.
detritus?
algae, detritus
129
117
114
110
107
104
7980
© 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 447–467
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/140/4/447/2624202 by guest on 16 November 2021
Common gastropods
The most common species of the Peyrère assemblage
are listed in Table 1. The outcrop contains more than
400 species of Gastropoda. In the studied samples, 387
species were identified among 12 117 specimens; of
these, only 25 comprise 66% (7980 specimens) of the
total. Members of the muddy detritical assemblage
(Alvania peyreirensis, Ringicula semidecorata, Benthonellania antepelagica, Alvania discazorum, Turritella raulini, Diastoma ultimum, Ceritoturris fecunda,
461
462
P. LOZOUET
Other molluscs and sessile or encrusting animals
The other principal molluscs are bivalves, with the
Arcidae making up the bulk of the biomass. The commonest species, Barbatia lithomoides, seems to be
restricted to Peyrère. The deformation of the valves
indicates a habitat in crevices and microcavities. Morphology of B. lithomoides is very similar to that of
Litharca lithodomus (Sowerby, 1833) of the Panamic
province (R. von Cosel, pers. comm.) which is cryptophilic (Keen, 1971: fig. 76). Among other common
bivalves we note Venericardia ruginosa, Spondylus sp.
and Dimya sp., all of which are sessile. Some oysters
doubtfully referred to Pycnodonte might have been
encrusting hard substrates at the entrance of submarine caves (Kase & Hayami, 1992; Hayami & Kase,
1996). Hayami & Kase (1993b) have also indicated as
occurring in the submarine caves of the Ryukyu
islands, the arcids Bentharca, Bathyarca (common at
Peyrère), the mytiloid genera Brachidontes, Septifer,
Crenella, Urumella and various Philobryidae. Apart
from Urumella, all are present in Peyrère. In the Japanese submarine caves there are also members of the
Propeamussiidae (not present in Peyrère), Limidae
and Carditidae (common at Peyrère). The biodiversity
of Bivalvia is not as high as in Ryukyu, with many
small, fragile elements absent. This suggests that Peyrère does not represent the primary environment of
most of the molluscs. Because the assemblage brings
together various biocenoses from diverse environments, it is to be expected that the most fragile transported elements are absent.
Many large and minute brachiopods including
megathyridids (Megathiris, Argyrotheca) and thecideids (Lacazella mediterranea (Risso, 1826)) have been
collected at Peyrère. The definitely sciaphilous affinity
of Lacazella and Argyrotheca suggest either a circalittoral or shaded substrate (Pajaud & Plaziat, 1972).
For Laubier (1966), Megathiris and Argyrotheca are
strictly cryptobiotic, being found in closed cavities.
Among the abundant Serpulidae (Polychaeta) of Peyrère, Placostegus is restricted to cryptic environments.
Coral debris is very frequent; the most common type
collected in the sample of marl of about 800 kg is a
caryophylliid identified by H. Zibrowius (pers. comm.)
as Polycyathus, a genus generally living on rocky circalittoral cliffs. An overturned large block of Porites,
1 m long and 80 cm high clearly demonstrates transportation in a mud flow. The shallow water interpretation of Scleractinaria (Cahuzac & Chaix, 1996) is
obviously based on these reworked littoral elements,
whereas a major part of the coral assemblage is of
circalittoral affinity, as demonstrated by Chevalier
(1963).
Palaeoenvironmental interpretation of the fossil
assemblage of Peyrère
The modern ecology of most of the representative genera suggests that this assemblage results from the
amalgamation of circalittoral muddy bottom molluscs
and hard substrate dwellers including those from
cryptic habitats. However, some species could also be
related to photophilic (infralittoral) algae (Julia,
Amphithalamus). A precipitous slope must have limited a shallow platform favourable to hermatypic corals and marine phanerogams, with its cliff and caves
or crevices. Overhangs, crevices or caves favour
sciaphilic organisms, even at the limited depth compatible with photophilic assemblages.
As a result, the very rich fauna of this locality illustrates the ecological diversity of adjacent biotopes
brought together by the steep canyon topography.
Rock and cave dwellers of various depths accumulated
in the circalittoral mud at the base of a cliff. Slumping
and mud-flow processes might account for the mixture
of well-preserved shells of diverse origins but the most
important feature is the topographic contrast of this
setting. It is also apparent that the littoral contribution is mainly gastropods living on algae and hard
© 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 447–467
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/140/4/447/2624202 by guest on 16 November 2021
habitats. Crisilla vera and Pusillina cf. grateloupi are
very common in calcareous shallow-water facies and
probably fed on algae. In any case, these species cannot be associated with a muddy bottom. The Trochidae
(Monodontella, Agathodonta, and Olivia (= Danilia))
live on hard substrates. Olivia spp. were probably
restricted to deep-water coral communities (Hickman
& McLean, 1990). Jujubinus as well as the rissoid Stosicia occur more frequently on algae and sea grasses,
although some species of the latter are possible inhabitants of cryptic environments. Volvarina occurs not
only in the palaeocanyon sediments but also in the littoral calcareous sand near Dax. The Triviidae (Hesperato) prey on ascidians. The ecology of the genus
Amphithalamus is not known with certainty although
Keen & Smith (1961) indicated that some species are
very common at the bases of Caulerpa. Amphithalamus and the pickworthiid Mareleptopoma are very
common in the Chattien deposits of the Adour Basin.
These species are well preserved in the shallow-water
facies and in the Peyrère assemblage. In the other
palaeocanyon outcrops, they are poorly preserved.
Comparison between the global Adour Basin malacofauna and the more specific locality of Peyrère demonstrates that the palaeocanyon assemblages are
products of the mixture of contrasting biocenoses. One
assemblage suggests life in muddy sediments at
depths corresponding to the outer shelf or upper slope
(circalittoral to upper bathyal), while the others were
probably transported from shallower biotopes including biogenic substrates and cryptic habitats.
EUROPEAN TERTIARY NERITILIIDAE
Other European faunas suspected of concealing
submarine-cave fossils
We have no record of a specific submarine cave malacofauna in the European Cenozoic; however, in light of
the Peyrère assemblage it is possible to identify some
likely localities. Five such environments are now
examined, ranging from the Palaeocene (Danian),
Lower Eocene (Ypresian) and Lower Miocene (Aquitanian and Burdigalian) to the Middle Miocene.
The rich malacofauna of the coral limestones of the
Danian of Fakse (Denmark) has been recently compared to that of Peyrère (Schnetler, Lozouet & Pacaud,
2001). Some species are very similar (e.g. Praescissurella peyreirensis Lozouet, 1998 and P. ravni
Schnetler, Lozouet & Pacaud, 2001). The Pickworthiidae are present, although the Neritopsidae and Neritiliidae were not recorded (K. I. Schnetler, pers.
comm.). In the Paris Basin, the Vigny assemblage
(Danian) is very similar to that of Fakse according to
Meyer (1987) and Pacaud, Merle & Mayer (2001), with
neritopsids found. The Lower Eocene (middle Ypresian) of the ‘Tuilerie de Gan’ (Pyrénées-Atlantiques,
south-western France) has a very rich malacofauna
(Cossmann, 1923). According to Merle (1985) it is similar to the Hungarian Upper Oligocene ‘Hinia and
Cadulus community’ of Baldi (1973), and interpreted
as a circalittoral to upper bathyal muddy bottom association. Dolin et al. (1985) also suggested that it is a
silty or muddy detrital assemblage. As the Hungarian
assemblage closely resembles those of the Adour
palaeocanyon (confirmed by Nolf & Brzobohaty, 1994,
in a study of the fish otoliths), the supposed global
autochthony of the Gan malacofauna becomes doubtful (Dolin et al., 1985). It is clear that the latter cannot
be interpreted as a homogeneous community. Analysis
reveals a mixture of inhabitants typically found in
cryptic environments: Neritopsis and the Pickworthiidae (Gania carinata Bandel & Kowalke, 1997) are
particularly common (J. Le Renard, pers. comm.). Various sessile organisms have been also collected: Brachiopoda, Serpulidae, Bivalvia (Spondylus, Dimya)
and Gastropoda (Vermetidae, Siliquariidae). Spongeeating Gastropoda (Cerithiopsidae, Triforidae) are
common. The cryptic species of Gan are therefore not
as abundant as at Peyrère, though clearly present.
In the Lower Miocene Saubrigues palaeocanyon
(Upper Burdigalian) (Fig. 7) several outcrops yielded
submarine cave molluscs indicating assemblages typical of muddy bottom environments. At St-Martin-deHinx a new neritopsid and three species of Pickworthiidae have been identified. In the Paratethys, Badenian stage (lower part of the Middle Miocene), Kostej
(Romania) is one of the most famous outcrops yielding
a rich malacofauna from which many new species of
gastropods have been described (von Zilch, 1934). It is
clear that the similarity between the Kostej and the
Peyrère faunas reflects the same diversity of environments (Lozouet, 1997). Cryptic elements are the Neritopsidae and Pickworthiidae associated with
Brachiopoda (Megathyridae, Thecideidae) and numerous sponge-eaters (Cerithiopsidae, Triphoridae).
These assemblages have been deposited in a circalittoral muddy environment at the foot of a submarine
relief. However Neritopsis moniliformis and Mareleptopoma cf. kenneyi, both indicators of cryptic environments, are also very common in the very shallowwater facies of St-Paul-lès-Dax ‘Maïnot’ (Lower
Miocene, Aquitanian). This is not a contradictory situation; in the Ryukyu archipelago (Hayami & Kase,
1993b) the entrances of submarine caves containing
typical cave malacofauna range between mean sea
level and depths of c. 40 m. The fauna is therefore easily reworked in beach deposits.
These brief analyses show that remains of submarine cave faunas are present in some outcrops. Future
© 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 447–467
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/140/4/447/2624202 by guest on 16 November 2021
substrates. The most common fossils of the sandy shallow-water facies collected in the Adour Basin are missing:
Naticidae
(Natica,
Neverita,
Polinices),
Nassariidae (Keepingia), Ampullospiridae, Olividae
(Oliva, Anazola), Terebridae (only two specimens of
Hastula), Cylichnidae (Acteocina), Ringiculidae (Ringicula minor, R. ventricosa). This indicates clearly that
the shallow-water malacofauna of Peyrère is contributed by fauna from hard bottom biotopes.
The malacofauna is therefore consistent with deposition at depths corresponding to the circalittoral zone
at around 60–95 m, according to the Mediterranean
data collected by Pérès (1982). This is in good agreement with evidence from fish otoliths (Steurbaut,
1982) and corals. The mass transport resulted from
nonbiological processes (debris flow rather than the
action of currents) because only a few specimens are
worn. The outcrop is located near the head of the
palaeocanyon (Fig. 7), so it may be inferred that the
submarine morphology includes cliffs submerged during the previous immersion of the Adour Basin. During the fieldwork, some huge blocks of Eocene
limestone (containing Nummulites) were discovered in
the marine marl sequences, thus corroborating submarine cliff collapse.
However, the originality of the Peyrère assemblage
is clearly due to the abundance of elements of hard
substrates and cryptic habitats. The CA highlights the
distinctiveness of its malacofauna among the various
sites of the palaeocanyon, the presence of Neritopsis
and Bourdieria being particularly characteristic. The
collection of marine neritiliids is thus part of the
remains of an Upper Oligocene submarine cave
fauna and could be the best indicator of such an
environment.
463
464
P. LOZOUET
investigations should uncover further assemblages
with submarine cave elements.
DISCUSSION
Upper Oligocene to Lower Miocene
marine Neritiliidae
Caribbean
Middle Eocene to
Lower Miocene Neritilia
Miocene submarine caves Neritiliidae
Indo-West Pacific
Figure 9. Geographic distribution of the Recent marine Neritiliidae (dotted line) and principal occurrences of the genus
Pisulina (䊉); fossil occurrences of the marine Neritiliidae (䊊); occurrences of the Recent (★) and fossil (✩) freshwater Neritiliidae.
© 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 447–467
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/140/4/447/2624202 by guest on 16 November 2021
The fossil record of the Neritiliidae is now known to
begin with the European Middle Eocene Neritilia
bisinuata sp. nov. In Europe N. neritinoides ranges
from the Lower Oligocene to the Lower Miocene
(upper Burdigalian). The present-day biogeographical
range of Neritilia (Fig. 9) includes West Africa, the
Caribbean Islands and the Indo-West Pacific tropical
province; all species live in freshwater close to the sea
in tropical environments except for two species
extending to south-western Japan (Kano et al., 2001;
Sasaki & Ishikawa, 2002) and subtropical eastern
South Africa (Bandel & Kowalke, 1999).
Neritilia neritinoides is recognized as an element of
freshwater fauna. Like other freshwater elements of
the Tertiary fauna, such as the Stenothyriidae, Pomatiopsidae and Thiaridae (Brotia), the Neritiliidae probably disappeared from the European Atlantic domain
during first major cooling period of the Tertiary, probably in the Middle Miocene (Serravallian) (Valdès &
Lozouet, 2000). This climatic event constitutes one of
the most important steps in the definition of the
present-day freshwater Palaearctic fauna. The disappearance of the Pomatiopsidae and Stenothyridae can
be correlated with the expansion of other prosobranchs like the Hydrobiidae (Lozouet, 1997) now
dominant in the European brackish and freshwater
malacofaunas.
Modern neritiliids lack conspicuous sculpture - the
fossil Bourdiera faviai is the only known species with
strong ribs. Therefore, fossil neritiliid species might
easily be allocated to the Neritidae, which are in gen-
eral strongly sculptured. In the Lower Miocene species
Pisulinella aucoini, large teeth on the outer lip (as in
B. faviai) are associated with a smooth shell. In the
same way, P. aucoini closely resembles the Indo-West
Pacific Miocene species P. miocenica; both have a
smooth shell but differ in the thickness and size of
teeth on the outer lip. The earlier P. aucoini has five
strong teeth on the outer lip, whereas P. miocenica has
many obscure tubercles. In modern Pisulina, teeth are
totally absent. The fossil record is still too poor to
make a strong claim for a direct phyletic line between
Pisulina and Bourdieria, but it is possible to posit a
hypothesis of a two-way evolutionary pathway of
marine Neritiliidae during the Neogene, leading to the
loss of sculpture and outer lip teeth.
Modern neritiliids are also restricted to the environment of submarine caves in the Indo-West Pacific
(Kano & Kase, 2000b). The abundance of well preserved B. faviai in the Upper Oligocene outcrop of
Peyrère, in association with the Neritopsidae and Pickworthiidae and other elements of cryptic faunas, can
be seen as providing the first evidence of a submarine
cave ecosystem during the Tertiary. While our knowledge of this environment is restricted to synchronously displaced fossil remains, its in situ preservation
must be considered exceptional (Taylor & Palmer,
1994). Few studies have been carried out on the molluscan faunas of submarine caves because these are
among the most difficult habitats to study. The first
detailed works address the littoral marine caves of the
Mediterranean (Starmühlner, 1955; Cattaneo-Vietti &
Fluvio-Russo, 1987; Balduzzi et al., 1989). Because the
Mediterranean suffered various extinctions of climatic
and eustatic origin, in addition to recolonization
events during the Pleistocene, neoendemisms do not
appear to have occurred. While it may be argued that
EUROPEAN TERTIARY NERITILIIDAE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Jean-Claude Plaziat (Université Paris-Sud, Orsay)
carefully reviewed an early draft of the paper and
provided numerous helpful suggestions and much
useful information. Richard N. Kilburn (Natal
Museum, Pietermaritzburg) and Rudo von Cosel
(MNHN, Paris) suggested improvements to the
manuscript, while Didier Aucoin (Paris), Jacques Le
Renard and Raymond Favia (both MNHN) provided
interesting material. Discussions with Y. Kano and T.
Kase (both National Science Museum, Tokyo) were
very useful. Arnaud Le Goff (MNHN) prepared the
SEM micrographs. I also thank P. Maestrati for considerable assistance in field work.
REFERENCES
Archambault-Guezou J. 1976. Etude de Dreissenidae du
Néogène européen et revue stratigraphique des niveaux correspondants de la Paratéthys. Unpublished thesis, ParisSud University.
Baldi T. 1973. Mollusc fauna of the Hungarian Upper Oligocene (Egerian). Studies in stratigraphy, palaeoecology,
palaeogeography and systematics. Budapest: Akadémiai
Kiado.
Balduzzi A, Bianchi CN, Boero F, Cattaneo-Vietti R,
Pansini M, Sara M. 1989. The suspension-feeder communities of a Mediterranean sea cave. In: Ros JD, ed. Topics in
marine biology. Scientia marina 53 (2–3): 387–395.
Bandel K, Kowalke T. 1999. Gastropod fauna of the Cameroonian coasts. Heligoland Marine Research 53: 129–140.
Bouchet P, Lozouet P, Maestrati P, Heros V. 2002. Assessing the magnitude of species richness in tropical marine
environments: exceptionally high numbers of molluscs at a
New Caledonia site. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 75: 421–436.
Brown D. 1994. Freshwater snails of Africa and their medical
importance. London: Taylor & Francis.
Cahuzac B, Chaix C. 1996. Structural and fauna evolution of
Chattian–Miocene reefs and corals in western France and
the northeastern Atlantic Ocean. In: Models for carbonate
stratigraphy from Miocene reef complexes of Mediterranean
regions. SEPM Concepts in Sedimentology and Paleontology
5: 105–127.
Cahuzac B, Janin MC, Steurbaut E. 1995. Biostratigraphie
de l’Oligo-Miocène du bassin d’Aquitaine fondée sur les nannofossiles calcaires. Implications paléogéographiques. Géologie de la France 2: 57–82.
Cattaneo-Vietti R, Fluvio-Russo G. 1987. Molluscs from
submarine caves of the Sorrentine Peninsula (southern Tyrrhenian Sea). Stygolia 3 (2): 138–148.
Chevalier JP. 1963. Les Madréporaires de l’Aquitanien
inférieur de Peyrère près de Peyrehorade (Landes). Annales
de l’Association Régionale pour l’Etude et la Recherche Scientifique 1 (2): 3–16.
Colgan DJ, Ponder WJ, Eggler PE. 2000. Gastropoda evolutionary rates and phylogenetic relationships assessed
using partial 28S rDNA and histone H3 sequences. Zoologica 29 (1): 29–63.
Cossmann M. 1923. Description des Mollusques. Le Gisement
Cuisien de Gan. Pau: Privately published, 1–188.
Cossmann M, Peyrot A. 1917. Conchologie Néogénique de
l’Aquitaine. Actes de la Société Linnéenne de Bordeaux 3 (1):
1–384.
Di Geronimo I, Allegri L, Improta S, La Perna R, Rossa A,
Sanfilippo R. 1997. Spatial and temporal aspects of benthic
thanatocaenoses in a Mediterranean infralittoral cave. Rivista Italiano di Paleontologie e Stratigrafia 103 (1): 15–28.
Dolin C, Dolin L, Lozouet P. 1985. Paleoecology of some
classic Tertiary localities in the Aquitaine and Paris Basins
of France. Mississippi Geology 5 (4): 4–13.
Duranthon F, Cahuzac B. 1997. Eléments de corrélation
entre échelles marines et continentales: les mammifères du
bassin d’Aquitaine au Miocène. In: Aguillar JP, Legendre S,
Michaux J, eds. Actes du Congrès BiochroM’97. Mémoires et
Travaux de l’Institut de Montpellier 21: 592–608.
Frontier S, Pichod-Viale D. 1991. Ecosystèmes, structures,
fonctionnement, evolution. Collection d’Ecologie. Paris:
Masson.
Gitton JL, Lozouet P, Maestrati P. 1986. Biostratigraphie
et paléoécologie des gisements types du Stampien de la
région d’Etampes (Essonne). Géologie de La France 1: 3–
101.
Grateloup S de. 1847. Conchyliologie Fossile des Terrains Tertiaires du Bassin de l’Adour (Environ de Dax). Tome I. Univalves. Atlas. Bordeaux: Lafargue.
Harzhauser M, Kowalke T. 2001. Early Miocene brackishwater Mollusca from the eastern Mediterranean and from
the central Paratethys – a faunistic and ecological compari-
© 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 447–467
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/140/4/447/2624202 by guest on 16 November 2021
the submarine cave environments of the Mediterranean are not particularly noteworthy (Balduzzi et al.,
1989), the Indo-West Pacific shoreline did not undergo
similarly dramatic events. It appears that the submarine coral-reef caves preserved a very original fauna
(Kase & Hayami, 1992; Hayami & Kase, 1993a). The
Indo-West Pacific province inherited its fauna from the
vast pan-tropical Mesogean (Palaeogene Tethyan)
province. Because of its relative stability and its great
latitudinal extension, this area harbours the greatest
species diversity for any group, particularly molluscs
(Bouchet et al., 2002). The presence of the Neritopsidae, Pickworthiidae and marine Neritiliidae in the
Peyrère assemblage reveals a pan-tropical biogeography rather than an anachronistic Indo-West Pacific
affinity. It provides evidence of ancient and modern
submarine cave faunas, traced definitively to the
Upper Oligocene, but probably appearing earlier, in
the Tertiary, with associations becoming differentiated
at the genus level prior to the Eocene. Its presence suggests that Tertiary fossils from similar environments
will continue to be found in Europe.
465
466
P. LOZOUET
tology, Part 1, Mollusca 1. Lawrence, Kansas: Geological
Society of America and University of Kansas Press.
Laubier L. 1966. Le coralligène des Albères. Monographie biocénotique. Annales de l’Institut Océanographique. n.s. 43:
137–316.
Legendre P, Legendre L. 1998. Numerical ecology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Le Renard J. 1983. Mise en évidence d’algueraies à Caulerpa
par les Juliidae (gastéropodes à de 2 valves: Sacoglossa) dans
l’Eocène du bassin de Paris. Geobios 16 (1): 39–51.
Limondin N, Rousseau DD. 1991. New Holocene malacological sequence at Verrières, Seine Valley, France. Boreas 20:
207–229.
Lozouet P. 1990. Benthonellania nouveau genre de Rissoidae
(Gastropoda, Prosobranchia) du bathyal atlantique. Bulletin
du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, 4e série, 12,
section A, 2: 313–328.
Lozouet P. 1997. Le domaine atlantique européen au Cénozoïque moyen: diversité et évolution des gastéropodes.
Unpublished thesis, Paris, Muséum national d’Histoire
naturelle.
Lozouet P. 2003. A new species of Iravadia s. str. (Gastropoda: Iravadiidae) from the Late Oligocene of the Aquitaine basin (S. France). The earliest record of brackish-water
Iravadiidae? Geodiversitas 25 (2): 237–242.
Lozouet P, Gourgues D. 1995. Senilia (Bivalvia: Arcidae) et
Anazola (Gastropoda: Olividae) dans le Miocène d’Angola et
de France, témoins d’une paléo-province Ouest-Africaine.
Haliotis 24: 101–108.
Lozouet P, Lesport JF, Renard P. 2001a. Révision des Gastropoda (Mollusca) du stratotype de l’Aquitanien (Miocène
inf.): site de Saucats ‘Lariey’, Gironde, France. Cossmanniana Hors série 3.
Lozouet P, Maestrati P, Dolin C, Favia R. 2001b. Un site
exceptionnel du Miocène inférieur (Aquitanien): la ‘Carrière
Vives’ (Meilhan, Landes, France). Bilan de la campagne de
fouilles de juillet–août 1991. Cossmanniana 8 (1–4): 47–67.
Lozouet P, Renard P. 1998. Les Coralliophilidae (Mollusca:
Gastropoda: Prosobranchia) de l’Oligocène et du Miocène
inférieur du bassin d’Aquitaine (Sud-Ouest de la France):
systématique et coraux hôtes. Geobios 31 (2): 171–185.
Magne A, Vergneau-Saubade AM. 1974. Les Neritidae tertiaires de l’Aquitaine occidentale. Bulletin de la Société de
Borda.
Merle D. 1985. Les communautés fossiles en tant qu’indicateurs paléobiologiques de milieux: exemples pris sur le cuisien de Gan (Pyrénées-Atlantiques) et l’Egérien de Hongrie.
Bulletin du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 4e. sér., 7,
section C, 4: 257–262.
Meyer JC. 1987. Le Récif Danien de Vigny. Géoguide 26: 1–72.
Nolf D, Brzobohaty R. 1994. Fish otoliths from the Late
Oligocene (Eger and Kiscell Formations) in the Eger area
(northeastern Hungary). Bulletin de l’Institut Royal des
Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre 64: 225–
252.
Pacaud JM, Merle D, Meyer JC. 2001. La faune danienne de
Vigny (Val-d’Oise, France): importance pour l’étude de la
diversification des mollusques au début du Tertiaire.
© 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 447–467
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/140/4/447/2624202 by guest on 16 November 2021
son by selected faunas. Journal of the Czech Geological Society 46 (3–4): 353–374.
Hayami I, Kase T. 1993a. Bivalves of submarine caves. University Museum, University of Tokyo, News 27: 1–3 [in
Japanese].
Hayami I, Kase T. 1993b. Submarine cave Bivalvia from the
Ryukyu Islands: systematics and evolutionary significance.
University Museum, University of Tokyo, Bulletin 35: 1–133
[in Japanese].
Hayami I, Kase T. 1996. Characteristics of submarine cave
bivalves in the Northwestern Pacific. American Malacological Bulletin 12 (1–2): 59–65.
Herbert DG, Kilburn RN. 1991. The occurrence of Pisulina
(Neritidae) and Neritopsis (Neritopsidae) in southern Africa
(Mollusca: Gastropoda: Neritoidea). Annals of the Natal
Museum 32: 319–323.
Hickman CS, McLean JH. 1990. Systematic revision and
suprageneric classification of trochacean gastropods. Natural
History Museum of Los Angeles County, Sciences Series 35.
Hinoide S, Habe T. 1991. Two forms of Pisulina adamsiana
G. & H. Nevill. The Chiribotan 22 (2): 49 [in Japanese].
Kano Y, Kase T. 2000a. Pisulinella Miocenica, a new genus
and species of Miocene Neritiliidae (Gastropoda: Neritopsina) from Eniwetok Atoll, Marshall Islands. Palaeontological Research 4 (1): 69–74.
Kano Y, Kase T. 2000b. Taxonomic revision of Pisulina (Gastropoda: Neritopsina) from submarine caves in the tropical
Indo-Pacific. Paleontological Research 4 (2): 107–129.
Kano Y, Kase T. 2001. Reallocation of Teinostoma (Calceolata) pusillum to the genus Neritilia (Neritopsina: Neritiliidae). Venus 60 (1–2): 1–6.
Kano Y, Sasaki T, Ishikawa H. 2001. Neritilia mimotei, a
new neritiliid species from an anchialine lake and estuaries
in Southwestern Japan. Venus 60 (3): 129–140.
Kase T. 1998. The family Pickworthiidae (Gastropoda: Caenogastropoda) from tropical Pacific submarine caves: four new
species of Sansonia. Venus 57 (3): 161–172.
Kase T, Hayami I. 1992. Unique submarine cave mollusc
fauna: composition, origin and adaptation. Journal of Molluscan Studies 58: 446–449.
Kase T, Kano Y. 2002. Trogloconcha, a new genus of Larocheine Scissurellidae (Gastropoda: Vetigastropoda) from
tropical Indo-Pacific submarine caves. The Veliger 45 (1): 25–
32.
Keen AM. 1971. Sea shells of tropical west America. Marine
mollusks from Baja California to Peru, 2nd edn. Stanford:
Stanford University Press.
Keen AM, Smith AG. 1961. West American species of the
bivalved gastropod genus Berthelinia. Proceedings of the
California Academy of Sciences 30 (2): 47–66.
Kerney M. 1999. Atlas of the land and freshwater molluscs of
Britain and Ireland. Colchester: Harley Books.
Kieken M. 1973. Evolution de l’Aquitaine au cours du Tertiaire. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France (7) 15 (1):
40–50.
Knight JB, Cox LR, Keen AM, Batten RL, Yochleson EL,
Robertson R. 1960. Systematic descriptions (Archaeogastropoda). In: Moore RC, ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleon-
EUROPEAN TERTIARY NERITILIIDAE
(Paleocene) of Denmark. Bulletin of the Geological Society of
Denmark 48: 79–90.
Starmühlner F. 1955. Zur Molluskenfauna des Felslitorals
und submariner Hölhlen am Capo di Sorrento. Österreichische Zoologische Zeitschrift 6: 147–249, 631–713.
Steurbaut E. 1982. Les otolithes téléostéens du gisement de
Peyrère à Peyrehorade (couches de passage de l’Oligocène au
Miocène d’Aquitaine méridionale, France). Mededelingen
Van de Werkroep Voor Tertiaire En Kwartaire Geologie 19 (2):
35–37.
Taylor PD, Palmer TJ. 1994. Submarine caves in a Jurassic
reef (La Rochelle, France) and the evolution of cave biotas.
Naturwissenchaften 81: 357–360.
Vail PR, Mitchum RM, Todd RG, Widmier JM, Thompson S III, Sangree JN, Bubb JN, Hatlelid WG. 1977.
Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 26: 49–
212.
Valdès A, Lozouet P. 2000. Opisthobranch molluscs from the
Tertiary of the Aquitaine Basin (southwestern France), with
descriptions of seven new species and a new genus. Palaeontology 43 (3): 457–479.
Von Zilch A. 1934. Zur Fauna des Mittel-Miocäns von Kostej
(Banat). Senckenbergiana 16 (4/6): 193–302.
© 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 447–467
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/140/4/447/2624202 by guest on 16 November 2021
Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences Paris, Sciences
de la Terre et des Planètes 330: 867–873.
Pajaud D, Plaziat JC. 1972. Brachiopodes thanétiens du synclinal sud-cantabrique au S. E. de Victoria (Pays Basque
espagnol). Etude systématique et interprétation paléoécologique. Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse 108 (3–4): 446–473.
Pérès JM. 1982. Zonations. In: Kinne, ed. Marine Ecology,
Vol. 5, Part 1. New York: John Wiley, 9–522.
Rousseau DD. 1987. Paleoclimatology of the Achenheim
series (Middle and Upper Pleistocene, Alsace, France). A
malacological analysis. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,
Palaeoecology 59: 293–314.
Rousseau DD. 1990. Statistical analyses of Loess molluscs for
paleoecological reconstructions. Quaternary International
7/8: 81–89.
Sasaki T, Ishikawa H. 2002. The first occurrence of neritopsine gastropod from a phreatic community. Journal of Molluscan Studies 68: 286–288.
Schepman M. 1908. The Prosobranchia of the Siboga Expedition. Part I, Rhipidoglossa and Docoglossa. Siboga-Expeditie, Monograph 49: 1–107.
Schnetler KI, Lozouet P, Pacaud J-M. 2001. Revision of the
gastropod family Sissurellidae from the Middle Danian
467