407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1545v36n41009
Biocontrol and seed transmission of Bipolaris oryzae and
Gerlachia oryzae to rice seedlings1
Andrea Bittencourt Moura2*, Juliane Ludwig3, Aline Garske Santos2,
Jaqueline Tavares Schafer2, Vanessa Nogueira Soares4, Bianca Obes Corrêa2
ABSTRACT - Bipolaris oryzae and Gerlachia oryzae, which cause rice brown spot and leaf scald, respectively, are mainly
disseminated by seeds. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of seeds microbiolization to reduce transmission
of these pathogens to seedlings by using the bacteria DFs185 (Pseudomonas synxantha), DFs223 (P. fluorescens), DFs306
(unidentified) and DFs418 (Bacillus sp.). Seeds naturally infested/infected with both pathogens were immersed in suspension of
these bacteria (A540 = 0.5) individually or in saline solution (control treatment). After 30 minutes of agitation at 10 °C, 400 seeds
were submitted to a sanity test through the blotter method and the isolate DFs223 was the best to reduce the incidence of B. oryzae
and G. oryzae in both seed lots evaluated. Seeds treated like above were sowed in sterilized vermiculite. Seed transmission and
growth promotion were recorded after 21 days of incubation in the same conditions. The isolates DFs185 and DFs306 reduced
transmission of both pathogens, although the isolate DFs306 was the one wich gave the greatest growth increases. The evaluation
of the in vitro antibiosis showed that isolates inhibited the mycelial growth of both pathogens, except DFs306. It is possible to
affirm that these bacteria have the potential to be used as a seed treatment for seed-borne disease control.
Index terms: biological control, rice brown spot, rice leaf scald, seed treatment, Oryza sativa L.
Biocontrole e transmissão de Bipolaris oryzae e
Gerlachia oryzae para plântulas de arroz
RESUMO - Bipolaris oryzae e Gerlachia oryzae causadores, respectivamente, da mancha parda e da escaldadura do arroz são
principalmente disseminados por sementes. Objetivou-se com esse trabalho avaliar o potencial da microbiolização de sementes
para a redução da transmissão destes patógenos das sementes para as plântulas usando as bactérias DFs185 (Pseudomonas
synxantha), DFs223 (P. fluorescens), DFs306 (não identificado) e DFs418 (Bacillus sp.). Duas amostras de sementes portadoras
de B. oryzae e G. oryzae foram imersas em suspensão dessas bactérias, sendo a testemunha imersa em solução salina (A540 = 0,5).
Após agitação (30 min./10 °C), 400 sementes foram submetidas ao teste de sanidade pelo método do papel de filtro e o resultado
indicou que o isolado DFs223 destacou-se na redução de B. oryzae e de G. oryzae nos dois lotes de sementes avaliados. Sementes
tratadas conforme descrito foram dispostas em vermiculita autoclavada e a transmissão dos patógenos e promoção de crescimento
avaliados após 21 dias de incubação em mesmas condições. Os isolados DFs185 e DFs306 reduziram a transmissão de ambos
os patógenos, porém o isolado DFs306 foi o que proporcionou maiores incrementos de crescimento. Avaliação de antibiose in
vitro mostrou que os isolados inibiram o crescimento micelial de ambos os patógenos, exceto DFs306. Pode se afirmar que estas
bactérias apresentam potencial para tratar sementes visando ao controle de doenças transmitidas por estas.
Termos para indexação: controle biológico, mancha parda do arroz, escaldadura do arroz, tratamento de sementes, Oryza sativa.
Introduction
The transmission of pathogens through seeds is an
efficient mechanism by which plant pathogens are spread over
long distances, are introduced in new cultivation areas and are
spread via plant population as random sources of primary
inoculum (Malavolta et al., 2002). Therefore, necrotrophic
pathogens use seeds as a vehicle for dissemination, as a
shelter and as means of survival.
In Brazil, Bipolaris oryzae and Pyricularia grisea are
1
4
Submitted on 07/25/2014. Accepted for publication on 11/05/2014.
Departamento de Fitossanidade, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Caixa
Postal, 54, 96010970 –Pelotas, RS, Brasil.
3
Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul, 97900000 - Cerro Largo, RS, Brasil.
2
Journal of Seed Science, v.36, n.4, p.407-412, 2014
Departamento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Caixa Postal,
354, 96010970- Pelotas-RS, Brasil.
*Corresponding author < abmoura@ufpel.edu.br >
408
A. B. MOURA et al.
mentioned as major pathogens associated with rice seeds,
followed by Gerlachia oryzae, Cercospora oryzae, Phoma
spp., Alternaria padwickii, Fusarium spp., Nigrospora oryzae
and Tilletia barclayana (Franco et al., 2001).
Damage caused by B. oryzae and G. oryzae, etiologic
agents of brown spot and leaf scald, respectively, is due to
the reduction in the number of seeds per panicle and their
weight, reflecting on the quality of the grown seeds, causing
a decrease in their germination. In addition, there is damage
from the early epidemic in the field due to the high percentage
of transmission of fungi from seeds to seedlings, which, in the
case of B. oryzae, may reach 15.1% (Malavolta et al., 2002).
In the search for reducing damage caused by these
pathogens, the use of resistant cultivars is recommended,
although the cultivars available in the market do not always
have the desirable levels of resistance and/or resistance to
more than one pathogen (Nunes et al., 2004). Another aspect
that limits the possibility of use of resistant cultivars is their
reduced usable life time brought about by the emergence of
new races of pathogens (Cornélio et al., 2003).
The brazilian market offers various compounds formulated
and registered for the control of most diseases present in rice,
but only four of them for seed treatment and, of these, only
one active ingredient is recommended for the control of B.
oryzae and G. oryzae (Agrofit, 2014). The chemical control is
effective but its use increases production costs and its residues
are accumulated in the environment besides increases
selection pressure, allowing the emergence of pathogen
populations resistant to these chemical compounds (Celmer
et al., 2007). Faced with this scenario, biological control
by microbiolization of seeds appears as a viable alternative.
Reports on the potential of different isolates of Pseudomonas
and Bacillus to control rice blast (P. grisea) (Krishhnamurthy
and Gnanamanickam, 1998) and seedling blight (Rhizoctonia
solani) (Commare et al., 2002; Wiwattanapatapee et al., 2004;
Souza Júnior et al., 2010) have shown encouraging results.
Studies on the biological control of brown spot and leaf scald
in rice through the use of microorganisms are still scarce, but,
Ludwig et al. (2009) reported the potential of bacteria for the
control of B. oryzae and G. oryzae when these pathogens were
inoculated on rice leaves. However, nothing is known about
the effect of biocontrollers during seed germination and their
impact on the transmission of seed borne pathogens.
Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect
of selected bacteria for the biocontrol of B. oryzae and G.
oryzae (Ludwig et al., 2009) on the incidence in seeds and
transmission of these pathogens in seed lots naturally infested/
infected with these pathogens.
Material and Methods
Effect of the microbiolization of seeds with biocontrollers on
the incidence of pathogens
Seeds of cultivars Chumbinho (lot 376) and Formosa
(lot 375) with incidence of B. oryzae and G. oryzae were
microbiolized with isolates DFs185 Pseudomonas synxantha
(Ehrenberg) Hollan; DFs223 P. fluorescens Migula; DFs418,
Bacillus sp. Cohn; and DFs306 (unidentified). Seeds were
immersed in a suspension of each bacterium with 24 hours of
growth in medium 523 (10 g sucrose; 4.0 g yeast extract, 8.0 g
casein hydrolysate; 0.3 g MgSO4; 2.0 g K2HPO4; 15.0 g agar)
prepared with saline solution (0.85% NaCl) and adjusted to
A540=0.5. The control was immersed in saline solution.
After a stirring period of 30 minutes at 10 °C, 400 seeds
were placed in gerbox® boxes, according to the blotter test
method (Brasil, 2009), incubated at 23 ± 2 °C under 12 hours
light/12 hours dark conditions.
The incidence of pathogens was evaluated after seven days,
individually examining the seeds in a stereoscopic microscope
and an optical microscope to confirm the characteristics of
conidia and conidiophores. The percentage of incidence was
calculated compared to the control, considered 100%.
Effect of biocontrollers on the transmission of pathogens
from seeds to seedlings
Seeds of the same lots from the previous trial were
microbiolized as described in the previous section, and then
planted in plastic cups with a capacity 50 mL containing
sterilized vermiculite, placing one seed per cup. The assay was
carried out inside transparent plastic boxes (41 cm x 30 cm x
30 cm) maintained in a moist chamber, where 25 cups were
placed and incubated at 23 ± 2 ºC, each box constituting one
experimental plot. The statistical design was a randomized
block with four replications of each treatment.
After 21 days of incubation in the above-mentioned
conditions, we evaluated the number of seedlings (percentage
of emerged seedlings). Subsequently, the severity of symptoms
caused by the pathogens was evaluated. Each seedling
received a score regarding the intensity of symptoms, where:
0 = seedling with no symptoms; 1 = slightly necrotic seedling;
2 = moderately necrotic seedling; 3 = highly necrotic seedling.
We calculated the average severity of each plot relative to the
total of emerged seedlings.
In addition, seeds that did not germinate (dead seeds)
were removed from the substrate and sterilized in sodium
hypochlorite at 1% for 1 minute. After that, they were washed
in running water and subjected to a moist chamber aiming
to determine the incidence of B. oryzae and G. oryzae, the
Journal of Seed Science, v.36, n.4, p.407-412, 2014
Biocontrol and seed transmission of Bipolaris and Gerlachia in rice
409
average incidence of each pathogens was calculated regarding
the total of non-germinated seeds in each plot.
Subsequently, of the developed seedlings, the root system
was cuted off from the shoot at the neck, and the length of
both parts was measured. To calculate the responses of each
treatment, the value of the control for each variable was
converted to 100%.
Antibiosis in vitro against B. oryzae and G. oryzae
The pathogens used in this test were isolated from the
seeds infested with them, observed in the above test.
The four biocontrollers isolates (DFs185, DFs223,
DFs306 and DFs418) were cultured in liquid medium 523
(10.0 g sucrose; 4.0 g yeast extract; 8.0 g casein hydrolysate;
0.3 g MgSO4; K2HPO4) for a period of 72 h at 28 °C.
Subsequently, 1 mL of each culture was centrifuged for 15
minutes at 9860 rpm (10,000 g). The supernatant was removed
and subjected to ultrasound bath (Ultrasonic Cleaner 1440D)
for a period of 20 min. for the disruption of bacterial cells
still present in the cultures, thereby obtaining the metabolic
liquid from each bacterial isolate. Separately, 10 mL of PDA
medium (Acumedia Potato-dextrose-agar) were transferred to
Petri dishes. After solidification of the medium, disks were
removed using a punch of 5 mm diameter, forming four
equidistant holes in the edges of the plates. The liquid formed
by metabolites of each isolate was added to the holes (20 mL).
Next, a 5 mm disk of G. oryzae or B. oryzae was placed in
the center of each plate. As a control, a disk of mycelium was
placed on a plate containing PDA without liquid metabolite.
The plates were incubated at 23 ± 2 °C for up to 14 days. The
evaluation occurred when the mycelial growth of the control
reached the edge of the plates, observing the occurrence of a
mycelial growth inhibition halo, considered an indicator of
antibiosis. In this test, four replicates for each bacterial isolate
were performed.
Statistical analyzes
The data obtained from the developed seedlings in the
test of pathogen transmission through seeds (severity of
symptoms, germination rate, length of root and shoot) were
subjected to analysis of variance and means grouped by the
Scott-Knott test at 5% probability.
Results and Discussion
The G. oryzae and B. oryzae incidence observed in blotter
test method for untreated seeds (control) was respectively
36.75 and 11.25% for lot 375; and 24.25% and 4.75 for lot
376. All treatments, when assessed by blotter test, reduced the
Journal of Seed Science, v.36, n.4, p.407-412, 2014
incidence of pathogens (in media B. oryzae by 18.8% and G.
oryzae by 20.5%), except in the isolate DFs418 in lot 375 for
B. oryzae and DFs306 and DFs418 in lot 376 for G. oryzae
(Figure 1). Larger decreases were observed in lot 376 for the
fungus B. oryzae in the treatment with isolate DFs185 (Figure
1B - 78.9%). When considering the average of the two lots,
the isolate DFs185 was the most effective for the control of
B. oryzae and isolate DFs223 for G. oryzae, both providing
control percentages of 40%. These isolates in the overall
average (pathogens and lots) also showed a similar behavior,
resulting in a reduction of 35 and 38% respectively.
Figure 1. Relative percentage of Gerlachia oryzae and
Bipolaris oryzae incidence in seed lots 375
(A) and 376 (B) naturally infested/infected and
microbiolized with different biocontrollers bacteria
isolates, as determined by the blotter test. Control
considered as 100%.
The high incidence of pathogens resulted in lower emergence
in sterile vermiculite, noting 44% of developed seedlings in the
control of both lots evaluated. In non-germinated seeds in the
control, a pathogen incidence of approximately 68 and 71% in
lots 375 and 376, respectively, was observed, and G. oryzae
represented 68% of these in both seed lots.
The effect of the biocontroller bacteria isolates, when
evaluated in autoclaved vermiculite, was similar to that
observed in blotter test. In general, all isolates reduced
transmission of pathogens from seeds to seedlings, particularly
in lot 376 (Figure 2). When considering the results for both seed
lots, the most efficient biocontroller isolates in reducing this
transmission, measured by the intensity of symptoms emerging
from the seedlings, were DFs185 and DFs306, since these were
placed in a distinct group from the control by Scott-Knott in
both lots evaluated. On the other hand, the incidence of fungi
on non-germinated seeds show that the biocontroller isolate
DFs223 seemed most effective in reducing the incidence of B.
oryzae and G. oryzae (24.3% and 27.5% respectively).
Growth promoting effects were observed for all bacterial
treatments on the length of the roots, which, on average,
resulted in an increase of 22 percentage points (Figure 3).
410
A. B. MOURA et al.
Again, the most intense effects were observed in lot 376.
The most effective isolate as a whole, when considering all
variables and both lots, was DFs306, resulting in an average
increase of 16%.
Figure 2. Relative percentage of transmission determined by
the severity of symptons in plants and incidence
of Bipolaris oryzae and Gerlachia oryzae in nongerminated seeds in seed lots 375 (A) and 376
(B) naturally infested/infected and microbiolized
with biocontrollers bacteria isolates, determined in
autoclaved vermiculite after 21 days of incubation
at 23 ± 2 ºC. Control considered as 100%.
used to reduce transmission of pathogenic fungi such as
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris by treatment with Bacillus
subtilis and Trichoderma harzianum, used individually or
in combination (Herváz et al., 1998). Correa et al. (2008)
showed the efficiency of this strategy when they microbiolized
bean seeds with biocontrollers bacteria of Xanthomonas
axonopodis pv. phaseoli to reduce the transmission of
Colletotrichum lindemuthianum of naturally infested/infected
seeds to seedlings. On the other hand, the transmission of
pathogenic bacteria Acidovorax avenae subsp. citruli from
the plant to the seeds, as well as from seeds to seedlings was
strongly reduced by microbiolization of watermelon seeds
with an A. avenae subsp. avenae or P. fluorescens isolate
(Fessehaie and Walcott, 2005).
Table 1.
Mycelial growth of pathogenic fungi provided
by biocontrollers isolates determined by in vitro
antibiosis using liquid metabolite obtained after
72 hours of cultivation at 28 °C of each bacterium
individually.
*Significant values different from the control by the Scott-Knott test (α = 0.05).
Bipolaris oryzae
Gerlachia oryzae
DFs185
+
+
DFs223
+
+
DFs306
-
DFs418
+
+
(+) presence of inhibition of mycelial growth; (-) absence of mycelial growth
inhibition.
Figure 3. Growth promotion expressed as a percentage
compared with the control: emergence rate, length
of leaves and roots of rice seedlings originating from
seeds of lots 375 (A) and 376 (B) naturally infested/
infected by Bipolaris oryzae and Gerlachia oryzae
and microbiolized with biocontrollers bacteria
isolates, determined in autoclaved vermiculite
after 21 days of incubation at 23 ± 2 °C. Control
considered as 100%.
It could be verified that all the isolates have a potential to
control pathogens by antibiosis, that is, they all produced at
least one compound capable of inhibiting the pathogenic fungi
tested, except for DFs306, which did not inhibit mycelial
growth of both pathogens (Table 1).
The biocontrol of diseases transmitted by seeds to
the seedlings as observed for B. oryzae and G. oryzae by
the bacteria evaluated have already been reported. The
microbiolization of seeds with biocontroller has also been
The growth promotion exhibited by the antagonists,
especially as for the root length (Figure 3), is known in
several plants species (Ahemad and Kibret, 2014), including
rice (Lucas et al, 2014; Souza et al., 2013). The biostimulator
effect in relation to seed physiological potential has been also
reported. In this sense, the bacteria studied in this work, in
the absence of pathogens and when used to microbiolize seed
lots with low quality, showed positive effects, highlighting the
isolate DFs185, which provided increased seed germination
and seedling emergence (Soares et al., 2012).
The increment of the different variables, especially fast
germination and intensive development of the root system,
may result, in the first case, in an escape of main soil pathogens
(Canteri et al., 1999), and, in the second case, in access to a
greater volume of soil, providing better nutritional conditions
and increasing tolerance to adverse weather conditions in the
field (El-Abyad et al., 1993). Therefore, these bacteria are
able to combine positive effects on the growth and health of
seedlings, resulting in a highly interesting possibility of use.
In this study, isolates DFs185 and DFs306 stood out in
the production of healthy rice seedlings (Figure 3), for both
seeds lots evaluated in vivo, although DFs306 did not produce
compounds capable of inhibiting the mycelial growth of the
Journal of Seed Science, v.36, n.4, p.407-412, 2014
411
Biocontrol and seed transmission of Bipolaris and Gerlachia in rice
pathogens when confronted in vitro. In this sense, it is worth
noting the possibility of DFs306 acting by resistance induction,
since this bacterium was not able to inhibit the mycelial growth
of B. oryzae and G. oryzae. On the other hand, the possibility
of isolate DFs185 also acting by resistance induction is not
ruled out, even knowing its in vitro antibiosis capacity. The
possible occurrence of induction by both bacteria is based
on the fact that when they were used in other studies, it was
observed control of Meloidogyne graminicola (Ludwig et
al., 2013) and R. solani (Ludwig and Moura, 2007), therefore
exhibiting nonspecific control, besides, they caused increased
activity of enzymes related to pathogenesis and induction of
resistance (Ludwig and Moura, 2009).
On the other hand, the isolate DFs223 stood out as a
whole, reducing both pathogens, both in blotter test and in
autoclaved vermiculite (non-germinated seeds), although
it did not provide the greatest reductions in all evaluations.
Additionally, it provided in vitro inhibition halos. This
bacterium, as well as DFs185, belongs to a well-studied
group of biological control agents, which makes it possible
to suggest that these isolates act by antibiosis for the control
of these pathogens. This possibility is supported by the fact
that these isolates, in addition to presenting antifungal activity
against the fungi used in this study, also act by antibiosis
against other rice pathogens, such as Alternaria lunata,
Curvularia lunata, R. solani (Ludwig and Moura, 2009) and
M. graminicola (Ludwig et al., 2013).
Another interesting aspect of the biocontrollers used in this
study is that they have the ability to colonize the root system
of plants of various cultivars of rice, thereby maintaining
a high population level during the crop cycle (Ludwig and
Moura, 2009). This feature allows the control to be effective,
resulting in beneficial effects (Okubara et al., 2004) such as
those presented in this study during germination and crop
establishment, as well as throughout the crop development
(Ludwig et al., 2009).
Finally, isolates DFs185, DFs223 and DFs306 present
characteristics that allow their use in leaf scald and brown
spot biological control programs. However, further studies are
required in the search for the elucidation of the mechanisms
of biological control/growth promotion, as well as studies of
combinations of isolates with different mechanisms that allow
a greater spectrum of activity and/or control amplitude.
Conclusions
All bacteria studied (DFs185, DFs223, DFs306 and
DFs418) promote early seedling growth even in the presence
of pathogens. Among these bacteria, DFs185 and DFs306
Journal of Seed Science, v.36, n.4, p.407-412, 2014
reduce transmission of B. oryzae and G. oryzae from seeds
to seedlings.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the brazilians National Council for
Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for the
first author’s productivity scholarship; the Coordination for
Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) for
the last author’s postdoctoral scholarship and the remaining
authors’ master’s scholarship; and the Foundation for Research
Support of the State of Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS) and
CAPES for funding the study.
References
AGROFIT. Sistema de agrotóxicos fitossanitários. http://extranet.agricultura.
gov.br/agrofit_cons/principal_agrofit_cons. Access on July 7th, 2014.
AHEMAD, M.; KIBRET, M. Mechanisms and applications of plant
growth promoting rhizobacteria: Current perspective. Journal of King
Saud University – Science, v.26, p.1–20, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
jksus.2013.05.001
BRASIL. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Regras para
análise de sementes. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento.
Secretaria de Defesa Agropecuária. Brasília: Mapa/ACS, 2009. 395p. http://
www.agricultura.gov.br/arq_editor/file/12261_sementes_-web.pdf
CANTERI, M. G.; PRIA, M. D.; SILVA, O. C. Principais doenças fúngicas
para manejo econômico e ecológico. Ponta Grossa: UEPG, 1999. 178p.
CELMER, A.; MADALOSSO, M.G.; DEBORTOLI, M.P.; NAVARINI L.;
BALARDIN, R.S. Controle químico de doenças foliares na cultura do arroz
irrigado. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v.42, n.6, p.901-904, 2007.
http://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/download/7645/4564
CORNÉLIO, V.M.O.; SOARES, A.A.; SOARES, P.C.; BUENO FILHO,
J.S.S. Identificação de raças fisiológicas de Pyricularia grisea em arroz no
estado de Minas Gerais. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, v.27, p.1016-1022, 2003.
www.scielo.br/pdf/cagro/v27n5/a07v27n5.pdf
COMMARE, R.J.; NANDAKUMAR, R.; KANDAM, A.; SURESH, S.;
BHARATHI, M.; RAGUCHANDER, T.; SAMIYAPPAN, R. Pseudomonas
fluorescens based bio-formulation for the management of sheath blight
disease and leaf folder insect in rice. Crop Protection, v.21, p.671-677, 2002.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02612194/21/8.
CORREA, B.O.; MOURA, A.B.; DENARDIN, N.D.; SOARES, V.N.;
SCHÄFER, J.T.; LUDWIG, J. Influência da microbiolização de sementes
de feijão sobre a transmissão de Colletotrichum lindemuthianum. Revista
Brasileira de Sementes, v.30, p.156-163, 2008. www.abrates.org.br/revista/
artigos/2008/v30n2/artigo19.pdf
EL-ABYAD, M; EL-SAYED, M. A.; EL-SHANSHOURY, A. R.; ELSABBAGH, S. H. Towards the biological control of fungal and bacterial
diseases of tomato using antagonistic Streptomyces spp. Plant and Soil,
v.149, p.185-195, 1993.
A. B. MOURA et al.
412
FESSEHAIE, A.; WALCOTT, R. R. Biological control protect watermelon
blossoms and seed from infection by Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli.
Phytopathology, v.95, n.4, p.413-419, 2005. www.seeds.iastate.edu/
images/10Fessehaie_et_al%202005_10.pdf
MALAVOLTA, V.M.A.; PARISI, J.J.D.; TAKADA, H.M.; MARTINS, M.C.
Efeito de diferentes níveis de infecção por Bipolaris oryzae em sementes
de arroz sobre aspectos fisiológicos, transmissão do patógeno às plântulas e
produtividade. Summa Phytopathologica, v.28, p.336-340, 2002.
FRANCO, D.F.; RIBEIRO, A.S.; NUNES, C.D.; FERREIRA, E. Fungos
associados a sementes de arroz irrigado no Rio Grande do Sul. Revista
Brasileira de Agrociência, v.7, n.3, p.235-236, 2001. www2.ufpel.edu.br/
faem/agrociencia/v7n3/artigo16.pdf
NUNES, C.D.; RIBEIRO, A.S.; TERRES, A.L. Principais doenças do
arroz irrigado e seu controle. In: GOMES, A.S.; MAGALHÃES JUNIOR,
A.M. (Eds.) Arroz irrigado no sul do Brasil. Brasilia: Embrapa Informação
Tecnológica, 2004. p.579-633.
HERVÁZ, A.; LANDA, B.; DATNOFF, L. E. R.; JIMÉNEZ-DÍAZ, M.
Effects of commercial and indigenous microorganisms on Fusarium wilt
development in chickpea. Biological Control, v.13, p.166-176, 1998. www.
ias.csic.es/rmjimenez/docs/articulos/Hervas_et_al.BiolControl...
OKUBARA, P. A.; KORNOELY, J. P.; LANDA, B.B. Rhizosphere
colonization of hexaploid wheat by Pseudomonas fluorescens strains Q8r196 and Q2-87 is cultivar-variable and associated with changes in gross root
morphology. Biological Control, v.30, p.392–403, 2004. naldc.nal.usda.gov/
download/9824/PDF
KRISHHNAMURTHY, K.; GNANMANICKAM, S.S. Biological control of
rice blast by Pseudomonas fluorescens strain Pf7-14: evaluation of a marker
gene and formulations. Biological Control, v.13, p.158–165,1998.
LUCAS, J.A.; GARCÍA-CRISTOBAL, J.; BONILLA, A.; RAMOS, B.;
GUTIERREZ-MAÑERO, J. Beneficial rhizobacteria from rice rhizosphere
confers high protection against biotic and abiotic stress inducing systemic
resistance in rice seedlings. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, v.82, p.4453, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-98-6-0666
LUDWIG, J.; MOURA, A.B. Controle biológico da queima-das-bainhas
em arroz pela microbiolização de sementes com bactérias antagonistas.
Fitopatologia Brasileira, v.32, n.5, p.381-386, 2007. http://www.scielo.br/
pdf/fb/v32n5/v32n5a02.pdf
LUDWIG, J.; MOURA, A.B. Controle Biológico de Bipolaris orizae no
arroz irrigado. In: BETTIOL, W.; MORANDI, M.A.B. (Eds.). Biocontrole
de doenças de plantas: usos e perspectivas. Jaguariuna: Embrapa Meio
Ambiente, 2009. p.317-330. https://www.embrapa.br/busca-de-publicacoes/-/
publicacao/579954/biocontrole-de-doencas-de-plantas-uso-e-perspectivas
LUDWIG, J.; MOURA, A.B.; SANTOS, A.S.; RIBEIRO, A.S. Biocontrole
da mancha parda e da escaldadura em arroz irrigado, pela microbiolização de
sementes. Tropical Plant Pathology, v.34, n.5, p.322-328, 2009. http://www.
scielo.br/pdf/fb/v32n5/v32n5a02.pdf
SOARES, V.N.; TILLMANN, M.A.A.; MOURA, A.B.; ZANATTA,
Z.G.C.N. Physiological potential of rice seeds treated with rhizobacteria or
the insecticide thiamethoxam. Revista Brasileira de Sementes, v.34, n.4, p.
563 – 572, 2012. www.scielo.br/pdf/rbs/v34n4/06.pdf
SOUZA, R.; BENEDUZI, A.; AMBROSINI, A.; BESCHOREN DA COSTA,
P.; MEYER, J., VARGAS, L. K.; SCHOENFELD, R.; PASSAGLIA, L.M.
P. The effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on the growth of rice
(Oryza sativa L.) cropped in southern Brazilian fields. Plant Soil, v.366, p.585–
603, 2013. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11104-012-1430-1.
SOUZA JUNIOR, I.T.; MOURA, A.B.; SCHAFER, J.T.; CORRÊA, B.O.;
GOMES, C.B. Biocontrole da queima-das-bainhas e do nematoide-dasgalhas e promoção de crescimento de plantas de arroz por rizobactérias.
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v.45, n.11, p. 1259-1267, 2010. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2010001100005
WIWATTANAPATAPEE, R.; PENGOO, A.; KANJANAMANEESATHIAN
M.; MATCHAVANICH, W.; NILRATANA, L.; JANTHARANGSRI, A.
Floating pellets containing bacterial antagonist for control sheath blight
of rice: formulations, viability and bacterial release studies. Journal of
Controlled Release, v.95, p.455-462, 2004. http://www.sciencedirect.com/
science/journal/01683659/95/3.
LUDWIG, J.; MOURA, J.; GOMES, C.B. Potencial da microbiolização de
sementes de arroz com rizobactérias para o biocontrole do nematoide das
galhas. Tropical Plant Pathology, v.38, n.3, p.264-268, 2013. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1590/S1982-56762013005000007
Journal of Seed Science, v.36, n.4, p.407-412, 2014