Coastal Trading: Full Ahead or Full Astern?
Nautical Institute

Coastal Trading: Full Ahead or Full Astern?

Nautical Institute Queensland Branch - Q&A Style Seminar

The Queensland Branch of the Nautical Institute held a ‘Q and A’ style seminar to celebrate World Maritime Day on Thursday, 15 October 2015. The Seminar was held at the premises of Norton Rose Fulbright in Brisbane, and was attended by more than 40 participants from various sectors in the maritime industry, including marine surveyors, serving mariners, marine pilots, maritime lawyers, marine insurers, shippers, and shipping line representatives.

The panel members comprised Ms Teresa Lloyd from Maritime Industry Australia Ltd, Captain John Lloyd from the Australian Maritime College Tasmania (and shortly to take up a position as Chief Operations Officer at the Nautical Institute), and Mr Peter Keyte from the Port of Brisbane Corporation. The seminar was facilitated by Mr Graham Miller of Slingshot Consulting, a former naval aviator.

The theme of the seminar was ‘Coastal Trading: Full Ahead or Full Astern?’, which is a topical subject in Australia given the introduction of new legislation into the Australian Parliament which will substantially change the regulatory landscape of coastal trading and is widely predicted to destroy what little is left of the Australian flagged coastal fleet (15 vessels).

Mr Ernie van Buuren, partner at Norton Rose Fulbright, opened the seminar with a brief outline of the regulation of coastal trading in Australia, beginning with the 1912 Navigation Act, the reforms in 2012 that were intended to revitalise Australian shipping, and then considering the current bill that is before the Australian Parliament.

The panel members then outlined their views on a range of themes that might be broadly summarised as follows:
• The role of cabotage in promoting a viable domestic shipping industry. Views spanned the broad spectrum of positions from protecting the domestic shipping industry, which is the usual policy position of every developed nation, through to complete de-regulation and opening the coast to foreign vessel competition, as has occurred in New Zealand;
• the comparison with aviation, where cabotage appears uncontroversial and politicians generally provide wholehearted support to protect the Australian aviation industry;
• the need to ‘reset’ the wages and conditions of Australian seafarers, as they seem to have developed out of kilter with broader community salary expectations, as well as beyond the international norm for seafarers salaries, even in first world nations;
• the Australian International Shipping Register (AISR) has no vessels on it due to a failure of policy in providing the appropriate fiscal settings to encourage shipowners to register their vessels on the AISR;
• generally, overcoming the ignorance and disinterest of our legislators from all sides of politics to ensure the development of solid bipartisan shipping policy. For there to be a viable coastal shipping industry, the maritime industry needs a broadly supported policy in order to escape the cycle of legislative amendments based upon sectoral interests that has been the norm for the past 40 or 50 years. The problem is of course that there is ‘no votes in boats’ and that most politicians perceptions of the maritime industry is of a potential ship grounding incident in the Great Barrier Reef;
• the need for maritime skills in Australia, and where those skills are going to be developed for the future. If Australia is going to have a policy of importing maritime skills into this country, then that policy ought to be explicit and planned for, rather than the ad hoc policy that seems to be in place at present;
• alternative pathways for developing maritime skills were discussed, including the placement of Australian cadets with foreign shipowners, the extent to which that is happening already, and the mechanisms by which that might be better achieved in the future; and
• the maritime industry provides a safe, efficient and cost-effective alternative to road transport in Australia, yet encouraging the switch from road to sea is fraught with risk for shippers because of the shipping service ceases for some reason, then they are captive to road transport, and their costs will increase.

A lively question-and-answer session then ensued, ably facilitated by Mr Miller, and the audience were fully engaged in the conversation.

It is to be hoped that seminars such as this will increase awareness and promote a consistent approach to the issues facing the maritime industry in Australia.

John Kavanagh,

Honorary Secretary, Nautical Institute Queensland Branch

Dirk Lorenzen

Master at Windward Isles Sailing Ship Co.

8y

A blanket regulatory requirement for the use of Aussie crew and Aussie flagged ships in coastal trading in this country would provide a blanket mandate to said union to keep holding shipping companies to ransom, smothering any attempt to revive this near-dead patient in the process. A significant change in attitude by this union is desperately needed to enable any meaningful improvement of the industry as a whole. Not holding my breath!

Like
Reply
Paul Titze

Marine Engineer | Captain | Maritime Trainer | Propulsion Physicist

8y

Hi John, It's pretty simple really, the law needs to be changed so coastal trading companies who want to do business in Australia need to use Australian flagged ships and Australian crew onboard. Our ship building industry is pretty small so it would be Ok to use foreign built ships however they have to meet our standards and get AMSA survey and get reflagged to operate in our waters upto 200nm. This is what needs to be done at government level to save the offshore industry. On the other side of the equation one union in particular also has part blame in the current situation and needs to become less greedy and stop making unrealistic demands on companies for better pay and conditions (which are already very generous in some sectors of the industry and need to be more realistic). I'm all for rights and conditions for workers however from what I've read in recent years some of the demands made were just ridiculous. Paul.

Like
Reply
John Kavanagh

Legal Practice Director at Pacific Maritime Lawyers

8y

Thank you for your comment Richard. An international perspective is always welcome. As a seafarer myself, I absolutely agree that seafarers' conditions need protecting, both because seafarers are vulnerable to exploitation, and also because we need to attract quality entrants to the industry. I also absolutely agree that the reforms are poorly planned. Having said that, it remains a fact that Australian ships (as distinct from Australian certified officers) are internationally uncompetitive, and it is impossible to make them competitive simply because the gulf in cost is so wide. So we need a new approach, because doing nothing is a vote for extinction of the shipping industry in this country. That will require some creative thinking and a new bipartisan approach to policy. Whilst I am not holding my breath, I am optimistic that by trying to steer the conversation away from the stereotypes of 'labour vs owners' and 'shipper nation vs shipping nation' we might make some progress to a sustainable bipartisan shipping policy. A policy where the fiscal and legal settings allow for Australians to own, operate and crew ships in this country for the good of everyone. Unlike the UK, where there is a long maritime tradition that is at least acknowledged by policy makers, in Australia, legislators view the shipping industry as either an industrial relations nightmare or an environmental disaster going somewhere to happen, probably in the GBR. Getting any traction has proven difficult over decades, even generations. But it feels like now it is really now or never. Because the way things are going, there will soon be no industry to revive.

Like
Reply
Ricky Rouse

Marine Pilot | AMPI Director | Business Owner | AFNI

8y

Coming from the UK where the wages have been reset, to extent that seafarers are tax exempt to make the salary even slightly appealing, and most contracts are for day rates with little in the way of pensions, redundancy payments, sick leave etc. Conditions don't need reducing, they need protecting. Domestic seafaring shouldn't rely on 3rd world deck crew/cooks/greasers to increase the profit margins of the corporations; every Australian seafarer that is paid a reasonable wage is also paying reasonable taxes and distributing that wealth into the Australian community (unlike the alternative). The reforms are ill thought out, and pander to the greed of large corporations instead of making a realistic effort to develop coastal shipping.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics