Premature Apple Fruit Drop: Associated Fungal Species and Attempted Management Solutions

Abstract

The aim of this research was to determine the incidence and possible causal pathogen(s) of premature apple fruit drop (PAFD), and also to assess some fungicides for controlling the disease organisms, in order to promote a sustainable system in orchards. The prevalence and natural incidence of apple fruit drop in cv. Anna was assessed during the 2017–2018 growing seasons in Nubaria and Cairo–Alexandria regions, Egypt. Phytopathogenic fungi were isolated from dropped fruit, and four fungicides, pyraclostrobin + boscalid, difenoconazole, carbendazim, and thiophanate methyl, were tested against the diseases in vitro and under naturally occurring infections in the field. Several phytopathogenic fungi, including Alternaria alternata, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Fusarium semitectum, and Penicillium spp., were associated with apple fruit drop. A. alternata was the most frequently isolated fungus occurring during the investigation. Pathogenicity tests confirmed that the maximum percentage of apple fruit drop was noted when petioles and fruits were inoculated with mixed fungal pathogens using branch sections with fruit. In vitro tests showed that the fungicides had a variable effect against the fungal isolates depending on the concentration used. All fungicides completely inhibited the growth of A. alternata, C. cladosporioides, and F. semitectum at 400 mg·L⁻¹. Under naturally occurring infections, thiophanate methyl applied at fruit set had the greatest effect (81.68%) against PAFD, followed by difenoconazole (73.76%), pyraclostrobin + boscalid (70.29%), and carbendazim (66.34%). The results indicated that PAFD may in part be a result of diseases caused by certain phytopathogenic fungi, which could be controlled using a number of fungicides applied at the beginning of fruit set.

1. Introduction

Apples (Malus domestica Borkh.) ranked third for worldwide fruit production, at 86.1 million tonnes and with the harvested area around 4,904,305 ha, in 2018. Egyptian apple production during 2018 was estimated to be about 704,727 tonnes and the harvested area nearly 28,085 ha, with a yield 25,092 kg·ha⁻¹ [1]. Apples are susceptible to several diseases, including apple scab (Venturia inaequalis), bitter rot (Colletotrichum spp.), black rot (Botryosphaeria obtuse), powdery mildew (Oidium spp.), sooty blotch (Gloeodes pomigena), flyspeck (Schizothyrium pomi), cedar-apple rust (Gymnosporangium juniperi-virgininae), and fire blight (Erwinia amylovora) [2]. Premature fruit drop is one of the major problems for apple production, leading to substantial losses in apple yield. In Egypt, it generally appears when the fruit has reached 40–50% of their final size [3]. This problem is especially noted when fruits are left to ripen for better red color development to meet consumer expectations. In some years, losses due to premature drop can exceed 50% of the total crop yield, causing significant financial losses [4].

Previous studies have indicated an association of several fungi involved in moldy core and core rot of dropped, as well as fully mature, apple fruit on the trees, but Alternaria alternata is the predominant fungal pathogen responsible for moldy core and core rot of apples in different regions of the world [5,6]. Basically, in apples after fruit set, there is a period in which fruitlet drop occurs 5–6 weeks after full bloom due to physiological causes, and this is referred to as June drop. Symptoms of moldy core can also include premature ripening and fruit drop. This disease is caused by many different species of fungi that naturally occur in the orchard.

In apple trees, the integration of aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) and naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) gave excellent premature drop control and did not reduce fruit firmness after controlled atmosphere storage [7]. In ‘Golden Delicious’ apples, AVG inhibited ethylene production, reduced premature drop, and delayed fruit maturation on the tree, and fruit ripening and softening during storage [8]. In the current research, we focused on premature fruit drop beginning around four weeks before the expected apple harvest date. To the best of our knowledge, there is a lack of pathological studies to determine if disease pathogens may be the causes of premature apple fruit drop (PAFD) in Egypt. Therefore, this research was designed to determine the incidence and possible causal pathogen(s) of PAFD, and to verify some means for controlling the diseases, in order to promote a sustainable system in orchards.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Disease Survey

This study was performed during the two growing seasons of 2017 and 2018 in the Nubaria region (Beheira Governorate) and on the Cairo–Alexandria desert road (Giza Governorate), Egypt. ‘Anna’ apple trees (Malus domestica Borkh.) showed natural fruit drop, and internal sections of dropped fruits showed core browning. A survey was carried out across 20 orchards at each location, four weeks before the expected harvest date. The proportion of orchards which had apple fruit drop were considered for prevalence, determined using the following formula:

$$\mathrm{Prevalence}(\%)=\frac{\mathrm{Number} \mathrm{of} \mathrm{fields} \mathrm{showing} \mathrm{fruit} \mathrm{drop}}{\mathrm{Total} \mathrm{number} \mathrm{of} \mathrm{fields} \mathrm{visited}}\times 100$$

Percentages of naturally infected apple trees, approximately 9–12 years old, showing fruit drop disease, were recorded in the above mentioned locations during April–May each year (Figure 1). Disease incidence (%) was calculated using the following Equation:

$$\mathrm{Disease} \mathrm{incidence}(\%)=\frac{\mathrm{Apple} \mathrm{trees} \mathrm{showing} \mathrm{fruit} \mathrm{drop} \mathrm{disease}}{\mathrm{Total} \mathrm{number} \mathrm{of} \mathrm{tested} \mathrm{apple} \mathrm{trees}}\times 100$$

2.2. Isolation and Identification of the Causal Agents

Isolation experiments were carried out on different parts of the fruit, calyx end, stem or pedicel end, and internal parts collected from commercial apple orchards showing fruit drop. Samples were collected as soon as they dropped after shaking the branches. Collected samples were smaller than healthy fruit, collapsed, and showed an abnormal appearance. To ensure that dropped fruit had not picked up the diseases from the soil and ground vegetation, the samples were washed under tap water then left to dry on folds of filter paper at room temperature. Small pieces, visually observed to contain both diseased and healthy tissues, were surface sterilized by immersing in 1% sodium hypochlorite solution for two minutes, rinsed three times in sterilized distilled water, left to dry, then transferred into 9 cm diameter Petri dishes containing potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium and incubated at 24 ± 1 °C for 3–5 days in the dark. The growing fungal colonies were purified using the hyphal tip technique [9,10]. Purified fungi were identified on the basis of their morphological characteristics, according to Barnett and Hunter (1986) [11]. Pure culture stocks of the isolated fungi were kept on PDA slants at 5 °C for further study. The frequency (%) of each fungal species was calculated using the following Equation:

$$\mathrm{Frequency}(\%)=\frac{\mathrm{Number} \mathrm{of} \mathrm{colonies} \mathrm{of} \mathrm{each} \mathrm{fungal} \mathrm{species}}{\mathrm{Total} \mathrm{number} \mathrm{of} \mathrm{all} \mathrm{fungi}}\times 100$$

2.3. Pathogenicity Test

To fulfill Koch’s postulates, pathogenicity tests were conducted on healthy ‘Anna’ apple fruit collected at 40–50% of full size and still attached to branches and petioles, from a private apple orchard located on the Cairo–Alexandria desert road (Giza Governorate, Egypt). Apples were thoroughly washed under tap water, surface sterilized with 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solution for 2 min, followed by washing three times in sterilized water, and then air-dried on sterilized filter paper. Finally, branches with prepared fruit were individually inserted into 1 L sterilized glass bottles, each containing 250 mL nutrient solution (1% urea + 2% K₂SO₄ + 0.5% ZnSO₄ + 0.3% Borax), as recommended by Khamis et al. [12].

Conidial suspensions of isolated fungi (Alternaria alternata, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Fusarium semitectum, and Penicillium spp.), individual or mixed, were prepared from seven-day-old cultures grown on PDA plates (9 cm in diameter), according to Hussien et al. [13], and adjusted to 10⁶ spores·mL⁻¹ following the methods of Lachhab et al. [14]. The same concentration of 10⁶ spores·mL⁻¹ was used for the mixed infection. Inoculation was done according to Youssef et al. [15], by injecting either fruit petioles or fruit with 50 µL of the spore suspension. A set of petioles and control fruit were injected with sterilized water only. The wounds were covered with melted (54 °C) wax [16]. Bottles were then incubated under laboratory conditions (18–25 °C) and high relative humidity for 5–7 days. Five bottles, each containing a branch with 4–5 attached fruit, were used as replicates for each treatment. The causal agents of rot were re-isolated for identity confirmation. Dropped fruit (DF) percentages were calculated using the following Equation:

$$\mathrm{Dropped} \mathrm{fruit}(\%)=\frac{\mathrm{Number} \mathrm{of} \mathrm{dropped} \mathrm{fruits}}{\mathrm{Number} \mathrm{of} \mathrm{fruits} \mathrm{remaining} \mathrm{attached} \mathrm{to} \mathrm{branches}}\times 100$$

2.4. Effect of Different Fungicides Against Causal Agents In Vitro

Four fungicides, pyraclostrobin + boscalid (Bellis^®), difenoconazole (Score^®), carbendazim (Kemazed^®), and thiophanate methyl (Onest^®), were evaluated in vitro for their efficacy against fungal mycelial growth. Fungal mycelia plugs (5 mm in diameter), from the growing edge of one-week-old cultures, were placed in the center of Petri dishes with PDA amended with the tested fungicides at final concentrations of 100, 200, and 400 mg·L⁻¹. PDA plates without any added fungicide served as the control. Each fungicide/concentration included three plates as replicates and the whole experiment was repeated twice. The inoculated plates were incubated at 24 ± 1 °C and radial fungal growth was recorded after 5–7 days of incubation. Fungal growth (mm) was calculated as the average of the orthogonal diameter [17,18].

2.5. Field Application of Different Fungicides Against Fruit Drop Disease

Four fungicides, pyraclostrobin + boscalid (Bellis^®), difenoconazole (Score^®), carbendazim (Kemazed^®), and thiophanate methyl (Onest^®), were evaluated in the field under natural conditions of infection at recommended doses (30 g, 50 mL, 50 g, and 65 g per 100 L of water, respectively) approved by the Agricultural Pesticide Committee (APC) in the Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation, Egypt. Those fungicides were already registered in Egypt to control apple scab and powdery mildew. The fungicides were applied by spraying the recommended dose at the beginning of fruit set on a private farm on the Cairo–Alexandria desert road (Giza Governorate), Egypt. Set fruits were counted before the fungicide application [15]. The orchards were divided into a randomized complete block design. Five trees, each with three branches/tree, were used as replicates for each treatment. Additionally, five trees sprayed with water only were used as the control. The percentage of dropped fruits was calculated as previously mentioned. Moreover, the efficiencies of the tested fungicides were calculated according to the following formula:

$$\mathrm{Efficienty}(\%)=\frac{\mathrm{Dropped} \mathrm{fruits}(\%) \mathrm{in} \mathrm{the} \mathrm{control} \mathrm{group} - \mathrm{Dropped} \mathrm{fruits}(\%) \mathrm{in} \mathrm{the} \mathrm{treated} \mathrm{group}}{\mathrm{Dropped} \mathrm{fruits}(\%) \mathrm{in} \mathrm{the} \mathrm{control} \mathrm{group}}\times 100$$

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Percentage data were arcsine-transformed before the analyses to normalize variance. Data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Statistica Software Ver. 6.0 (Stat Soft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA). Fisher’s protected least significant difference test was used at p ≤ 0.05 to distinguish the differences among various treatments [19].

3. Results

3.1. Disease Survey

Disease was observed in all locations. Data presented in

Table 1. Disease incidence (%) of dropped apple fruit in the investigated locations.

Locations	Disease Incidence (%)
	2017 Season	2018 Season
Nubaria region (Beheira Governorate)	69.7 ± 1.46a z	75.3 ± 1.13a
Cairo–Alexandria desert road (Giza Governorate)	61.5 ± 1.03a	73.5 ± 1.45b

^z Means ± standard error followed by different letters within seasons are significantly different by Fisher’s protected LSD test at p ≤ 0.05.

show that the disease incidence (%) was higher during 2018 than 2017. The maximum disease incidence (75.3%) was recorded in the Nubaria region followed by the Cairo–Alexandria desert road (73.5%) in 2018, but reached 69.7% and 61.5%, respectively, in 2017.

3.2. Isolation and Identification of the Causal Organisms

The frequency of fungi isolated from naturally infected apple fruit collected from two different locations is shown in

Table 2. Frequency (%) of fungal species from naturally infected ‘Anna’apple fruit collected from different locations in Beheira and Giza Governorates, Egypt.

Fungus	Nubaria Region (Beheira Governorate)	Cairo–Alexandria Desert Road (Giza Governorate)	Mean (%)
Alternaria alternata	62.0 ± 1.15a z	58.0 ± 2.30a	60.0
Cladosporium cladosporioides	18.0 ± 2.03b	20.0 ± 0.88b	19.0
Fusarium semitectum	12.0 ± 1.16b	10.0 ± 0.58b	11.0
Penicillium spp.	8.0 ± 0.67b	12.0 ± 1.15b	10.0

^z Means± standard error followed by different letters within the same column are statistically different according to Fisher’s protected LSD test (p ≤ 0.05).

. Isolation and identification revealed that four different fungi, Alternaria alternata, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Fusarium semitectum, and Penicillium spp., were associated with the naturally infected apple fruit, with average frequencies of 60%, 19%, 11%, and 10%, respectively. In general, A. alternata was the most prevalent fungus isolated.

3.3. Pathogenicity of the Isolated Fungi

Koch’s postulates were fulfilled by artificially infecting ‘Anna’apple fruit attached to branches collected from 12-year-old trees. After seven days, tests confirmed that the pathogenicity of the fungal isolates varied between them in terms of infection rate, whereas the control treatment did not show any symptoms. Generally, the maximum percentage of dropped fruit was recorded on petioles and fruits inoculated with mixed fungal pathogens, at 78% and 62%, respectively (

Table 3. Pathogenicity of the isolated fungi on ‘Anna’ apple petioles and fruits expressed as the percentage of dropped fruits.

Pathogen	Dropped Fruits (%)
	Petioles	Fruits
Alternaria alternata	62.0 ± 0.88b z	52.0 ± 2.31b
Cladosporium cladosporioides	40.0 ± 1.15c	30.0 ± 2.91c
Fusarium semitectum	22.0 ± 1.45d	18.0 ± 1.15d
Penicillium spp.	8.0 ± 1.15e	6.0 ± 1.15e
Mixed fungi	78.0 ± 0.88a	62.0 ± 2.30a
Control	0.0 ± 0.0f	0.0 ± 0.0e

^z Means ± standard error followed by different letters within the same column are statistically different according to Fisher’s protected LSD test (p ≤ 0.05).

). Comparing pathogens, the results showed that the percentages of dropped fruit were higher on petioles and fruits inoculated with A. alternata, followed by C. cladosporioides, and then F. semitectum. The lowest percentage of dropped fruits was observed for Penicillium spp., which was ignored for subsequent experiments.

3.4. Effect of Different Fungicides against Causal Agents In Vitro

The effectiveness of four fungicides, each applied at three different concentrations, against the isolated pathogenic fungi is shown in

Table 4. Effect of four fungicides at 100, 200, and 400 mg·L⁻¹ against isolated pathogenic fungi growth (mm) in vitro recovered from ‘Anna’ apples after premature fruit drop.

Active Ingredient	Fungal Growth (mm)
	A. alternata			C. cladosporioides			F. semitectum
	100	200	400	100	200	400	100	200	400
	(mg·L−1)
Pyraclostrobin + boscalid (38% WG)	51.3 ± 1.33c z	26.7 ± 0.66c	0.0 ± 0.0b	58.7 ± 2.40b	18.7 ± 0.67b	0.0 ± 0.0b	49.3 ± 0.66b	28.7 ± 0.67b	0.0 ± 0.0b
Difenoconazole (25% EC)	29.3 ± 0.67d	0.0 ± 0.0d	0.0 ± 0.0b	20.7 ± 0.66d	0.0 ± 0.0c	0.0 ± 0.0b	41.3 ± 0.67c	23.3 ± 0.66c	0.0 ± 0.0b
Carbendazim (50% WP)	58.0 ± 2.0b	39.3 ± 0.66b	0.0 ± 0.0b	27.3 ± 1.3c	0.0 ± 0.0c	0.0 ± 0.0b	18.7 ± 0.66d	0.0 ± 0.0d	0.0 ± 0.0b
Thiophanate methyl (70% WP)	22.0 ± 1.15e	0.0 ± 0.0d	0.0 ± 0.0b	16.7 ± 0.67d	0.0 ± 0.0c	0.0 ± 0.0b	15.3 ± 0.67e	0.0 ± 0.0d	0.0 ± 0.0b
H2O	90.0 ± 0.0a	90.0 ± 0.0a	90.0 ± 0.0a	90.0 ± 0.0a	90.0 ± 0.0a	90.0 ± 0.0a	90.0 ± 0.0a	90.0 ± 0.0a	90.0 ± 0.0a

^z Means ± standard error followed by different letters within the same column are statistically different according to Fisher’s protected LSD test (p ≤ 0.05).

. Generally, all fungicides completely inhibited the growth of A. alternata, C. cladosporioides, and F. semitectum at 400 mg·L⁻¹. Additionally, difenoconazole completely inhibited the growth of A. alternata and C. cladosporioides at 200 mg·L⁻¹; thiophanate methyl was able to completely inhibit the three pathogens at 200 mg·L⁻¹; carbendazim completely inhibited C. cladosporioides and F. semitectum at 200 mg·L⁻¹¹. None of the fungicides suppressed the pathogens at 100 mg.L⁻¹.

3.5. Field Application of Different Fungicides Against Fruit Drop Disease

The effect of the four fungicides was evaluated for the control of apple fruit drop disease under natural field infection. Apple fruit drop percentages were 12.0%, 10.6%, 13.6%, and 7.4% on trees treated with pyraclostrobin + boscalid, difenoconazole, carbendazim, and thiophanate methyl, respectively (

Table 5. Efficiency (%) of four fungicides against apple fruit drop in ‘Anna’ apples under naturally occurring infection in the orchard.

Active Ingredient	Applied Dose	Dropped Fruits (%)	Efficiency (%)
Pyraclostrobin + boscalid (38% WG)	30 g·100 L−1	12.0 ± 0.63bc z	70.29
Difenoconazole (25% EC)	50 mL·100 L−1	10.6 ± 0.98c	73.76
Carbendazim (50% WP)	50 g·100 L−1	13.6 ± 1.32b	66.34
Thiophanate methyl (70% WP)	65 g·100 L−1	7.4 ± 0.50d	81.68
Control	-	40.4 ± 0.75a	-

^z Means ± standard error followed by different letters within the same column are statistically different according to Fisher’s protected LSD test (p ≤ 0.05).

). The thiophanate methyl fungicide was the best one and recorded an efficiency of 81.6%, followed by difenoconazole, pyraclostrobin + boscalid, and carbendazim, as compared with the control group.

4. Discussion

The objectives of this research were to determine the incidence and possible causal pathogens of PAFD, and to verify the activity of some fungicides to control the disease. PAFD is becoming more common and severe in apple orchards in Egypt, and is inflicting substantial losses. This phenomenon, naturally common in fruit trees, usually occurs immediately prior to fruit ripening. A separation zone occurs either in the proximal end contact area of the pedicel ofthe fruit, or it may occur in the layer of fruit peel and skin [20]. There are several factors that can trigger early fruit drop, including overcropping, insufficient pollination, high ethylene levels, excessive summer pruning, insect damage/diseases, extremes in weather, and poor tree nutrition.

The results of this study showed that the maximum incidence of fruit drop occurred in the Nubaria region (75%) followed by the Cairo–Alexandria desert road (73.5%) area in 2018. Several factors, including the suitability of regular agricultural practices, age of the orchard, types and efficiency of sanitary methods, and chemical protectant or curative treatments against diseases and insects, were likelyinvolved, which may explain the differences between the inspected locations and growing seasons. Similarly, Raja et al. [4] demonstrated that orchard and climatic factors, including mineral nutrition, summer pruning, insects and mites, water availability, and growing season temperatures, can affect premature fruit drop.

In addition to the other factors, diseases have an important role in lowering the yield of fruit trees. In this study, various phytopathogenic fungi, i.e., A. alternata, C. cladosporioides, F. semitectum, and Penicillium spp., were recovered from dropped apple fruit. A. alternata was the most frequently isolated fungus. Previously, several fungi, such as Alternaria spp., Penicillium spp., and Fusarium spp., were isolated from apple fruit. Particularly, Alternaria spp. was the most common fungus associated with diseased ‘Anna’ apple fruit [6]. Moreover, Gao et al. [21] found that A. alternata, A. tenuissima, A. arborescens, C. cladosporioides, and C. tenuissimum were the main pathogens causing core browning and moldy core of ‘Fuji’ apple fruit in China. Furthermore, A. alternata, Pleospora herbarum, Coniothyrium spp., Penicillium funiculosum, P. expansum, and P. ramulosum were associated with core rot of ‘Starking Delicious’ apple fruit in South Africa [22,23]. In a previous study, four phytopathogenic fungi, A. alternata, Lasiodiplodia theobromae, F. semitectum, and Pestalotia psidii, were isolated from dropped guava fruit samples collected from different orchards [15].

Pathogenicity tests confirmed that the maximum percentage of PAFD was noted on petioles and fruits inoculated with mixed fungal pathogens. In particular, the percentages of PAFD were higher when the fruit were artificially inoculated with A. alternata, followed by C. cladosporioides and F. semitectum. Racskó et al. [24] confirmed that fruit drop is often caused by damage due to diseases and pests. Additionally, a fungus causing peach brown rot (Monilinia fructicola) was recognized as initiating fruit drop. It is polyphagous, appears in many fruit species, and is responsible for immediate premature fruit drop. A significant pathogen of larger fruit (apple, pear, apricot, peach), as well as smaller fruit (sweet and sour cherry, plum), may be due to fruit on trees overwintering as shriveled mummies [25,26,27]. Likewise, A. alternata and F. semitectum were associated with brown apical necrosis and caused fruit drop of English walnut [28].

In vitro tests showed that four fungicides had a variable effect against the isolated fungi, depending on the concentration used. All fungicides completely inhibited the growth of A. alternata, C. cladosporioides, and F. semitectum at 400 mg·L⁻¹. Under naturally occurring infection, fruit set application of thiophanate methyl had the highest efficacy (81.68%) against PAFD, followed by difenoconazole (73.76%), pyraclostrobin + boscalid (70.29%), and carbendazim (66.34%). The fungicides used in this research are registered to control apple scab and powdery mildew in several countries, including Egypt, and farmers frequently use them during the season, depending on the management program in the orchard. Thus, it is easy to integrate these fungicides in the integrated pest management program of apple. We believe that the further application of those fungicides to apple trees can play a role in reducing fruit drop. Fungicide application at fruit set may work since its early application can help to reduce or prevent primary infections/inocula by the phytopathogenic fungi identified by this research. In fact, if primary infection by phytopathogenic fungi is not well controlled, secondary infection will be a problem and be more difficult to manage. Any delay incontrolling the disease is not recommended, even if adequate fungicides are used. PAFD is variable among orchards, suggesting that cultural management can influence fruit drop. Strategies to reduce PAFD can help preserve crop yield, which is an essential factor for the economic success of an orchard [29]. In this context, a previous study showed that guava fruit drop could be controlled by applying either thiophanate methyl 50% + thiram 30% or carbendazim (50% WP) at aproportionof 70 g·100 L⁻¹ water [15]. The successful control of a disease is dependent on the reliability of pathogen detection at a latent phase [30]. Raja et al. [4] summarized some effective compounds to reduce premature drop, such as naphthaleneacetic acid, naphthalene acetamide, propionic acid, propanoic acid, 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid, lactidichlor ethyl, and butyric acid. Additionally, other plant growth regulators have been investigated for their ability to reduce fruit drop, such as gibberellic acid (GA₃), 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic (2,4-D), and hydrogen peroxide [31].

Flowering and fruit set are probably the most important of allthe events occurring once an apple tree has reached reproductive maturity. Given favorable environmental conditions, the timing and intensity of flowering greatly determines when and how much fruit will be produced during the season. Prolonged flooding may lead to fruit and leaf drop, leaf chlorosis, stem dieback, and tree death. Trees are generally more tolerant of flooding during cool weather [32]. The majority of phytopathogenic fungi affecting flowers promotes and speeds up abscission [33]. In apple, the varieties exhibiting less fruit drop were ‘Stayman’, ‘Gala’, ‘Melrose’, ‘Akane’, and ‘Fuji’ [24]. In citrus species, fruit drop after bloom was caused by Colletotrichum acutatum and C. gloeosporioides [34]. Nature provides plants with phenolic compounds that may play an essential role in growth and resistance to pathogens, and exhibit a wide range of anti-microbial effects [35]. Racskó et al. [24] showed that fruit drop in walnuts was induced by Gnomonia spp., but the symptoms appeared only on the epicarp. In peaches, premature fruit drop caused by Venturia carpophila, the causal agent of scab, is dangerous during an extended period of drought. With a vigorous infection, fruit drop may occur in peaches when infected by Taphrina deformans, causing leaf-curl disease [24]. Finally, severe fruit drop could contribute to low yield in apple orchards and lead to great economic losses in many production areas. The role of different horticultural and climatic factors in apple fruit drop has not been fully investigated. This is the first research dealing with PAFD disease under Egyptian conditions.

5. Conclusions

Alternaria alternata, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Fusarium semitectum, and Penicillium spp. were associated with apple fruit drop, with A. alternata being the most prevalent. The maximum percentage of apple fruit drop in lab tests was observedwhen petioles and fruitswere inoculated with mixed fungal pathogens. The fungicides pyraclostrobin + boscalid, difenoconazole, carbendazim, and thiophanate methyl completely inhibited the growth of A. alternata, C. cladosporioides, and F. semitectum at 400 mg·L⁻¹ in in vitro tests. Under natural occurring infection, thiophanate methyl had the highest efficacy in reducing premature fruit drop, followed by difenoconazole, pyraclostrobin + boscalid, and carbendazim, when applied at the beginning of fruit set. Premature apple fruit drop is a complex phenomenon and there are various factors affecting it, such as mineral nutrition, summer pruning, insects and diseases, moisture availability, and growing season temperatures. This research indicated that PAFD may also be a result of diseases caused by certain phytopathogenic fungi, which could be controlled using a number of fungicides at the fruit set stage. We recommend that growers in arid climates might need to apply fungicides more frequently than is commonly done to overcome this problem. Finally, further studies are needed to investigate the importance of disease in premature fruit drop.